Lee Seungwon, Doktorchik Chelsea, Martin Elliot Asher, D'Souza Adam Giles, Eastwood Cathy, Shaheen Abdel Aziz, Naugler Christopher, Lee Joon, Quan Hude
Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Feb 1;9(2):e23934. doi: 10.2196/23934.
Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain large amounts of rich clinical information. Developing EMR-based case definitions, also known as EMR phenotyping, is an active area of research that has implications for epidemiology, clinical care, and health services research.
This review aims to describe and assess the present landscape of EMR-based case phenotyping for the Charlson conditions.
A scoping review of EMR-based algorithms for defining the Charlson comorbidity index conditions was completed. This study covered articles published between January 2000 and April 2020, both inclusive. Embase (Excerpta Medica database) and MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) were searched using keywords developed in the following 3 domains: terms related to EMR, terms related to case finding, and disease-specific terms. The manuscript follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines.
A total of 274 articles representing 299 algorithms were assessed and summarized. Most studies were undertaken in the United States (181/299, 60.5%), followed by the United Kingdom (42/299, 14.0%) and Canada (15/299, 5.0%). These algorithms were mostly developed either in primary care (103/299, 34.4%) or inpatient (168/299, 56.2%) settings. Diabetes, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and rheumatology had the highest number of developed algorithms. Data-driven and clinical rule-based approaches have been identified. EMR-based phenotype and algorithm development reflect the data access allowed by respective health systems, and algorithms vary in their performance.
Recognizing similarities and differences in health systems, data collection strategies, extraction, data release protocols, and existing clinical pathways is critical to algorithm development strategies. Several strategies to assist with phenotype-based case definitions have been proposed.
电子病历(EMR)包含大量丰富的临床信息。开发基于电子病历的病例定义,也称为电子病历表型分析,是一个活跃的研究领域,对流行病学、临床护理和卫生服务研究具有重要意义。
本综述旨在描述和评估基于电子病历的查尔森病症病例表型分析的现状。
完成了一项关于基于电子病历定义查尔森合并症指数病症的算法的范围综述。本研究涵盖了2000年1月至2020年4月(含)期间发表的文章。使用在以下三个领域中制定的关键词对Embase(医学文摘数据库)和MEDLINE(医学文献分析与检索系统在线)进行搜索:与电子病历相关的术语、与病例发现相关的术语以及疾病特定术语。本手稿遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述(PRISMA)指南。
共评估和总结了代表299种算法的274篇文章。大多数研究在美国进行(181/299,60.5%),其次是英国(42/299,14.0%)和加拿大(15/299,5.0%)。这些算法大多是在初级保健(103/299,34.4%)或住院环境(168/299,56.2%)中开发的。糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭、心肌梗死和风湿病开发的算法数量最多。已确定了数据驱动和基于临床规则的方法。基于电子病历的表型和算法开发反映了各自卫生系统允许的数据访问情况,并且算法在性能上存在差异。
认识到卫生系统、数据收集策略、提取、数据发布协议和现有临床路径中的异同对于算法开发策略至关重要。已经提出了几种有助于基于表型的病例定义的策略。