Seki Kumiko, Kuroiwa Kaori, Tanaka Toshiki, Takano Takahiro, Nishizawa Masaaki
Masui. 2014 Oct;63(10):1093-6.
After the operation, early postoperative ambulation has been recommended for thromboprophylaxis. As more anticoagulant drugs have become available, hemorrhagic complication of epidural anesthesia is the focus of attention. Recently, the spread of ultrasound-guided nerve block has improved the efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane block Therefore, we compared transversus abdominis plane block with epidural anesthesia regarding postoperative numerical scale in patients undergoing gynecological surgery.
Doses of administrated narcotics during anesthesia, frequencies of administration of analgesics and vomiting up to 24 hours postoperatively, and numerical rating scale (NRS) at the first and 18th postoperative hours were retrospectively surveyed in patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane combined with either single epidural injection of 6-12 ml of 0.375- 0.75% lopivacaine with 2-4 mg of morphine in 16 patients (Epi group) or ultrasound-guided transverses bilateral abdominis plane block (TAPB) using 20 ml of 0.375% lopivacaine, respectively, in 16 patients (TAP group).
No significant differences were found in age, height, weight, ASA-physical status, volume of intraoperative blood loss and surgical time. Both the total administrated doses of remifentanil and fentanyl during anesthesia in TAP group were significantly larger than those in Epi group. Number of postoperative vomiting was larger in Epi group. However, NRS at the postoperative first and 18th hours showed no significant differences between the two groups. The technique of ultrasound-guided TAPB is relatively easy compared with that of epidural injection and TAPB has an advantage in availability in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy.
No significant difference in postoperative NRS between two groups in this survey suggests that TAPB in combination with appropriate postoperative pain service is useful in patients contraindicated to epidural puncture.
手术后,建议早期术后活动以预防血栓形成。随着更多抗凝药物的出现,硬膜外麻醉的出血并发症成为关注焦点。近来,超声引导神经阻滞的普及提高了腹横肌平面阻滞的效果。因此,我们比较了腹横肌平面阻滞和硬膜外麻醉在妇科手术患者术后数字评分方面的差异。
回顾性调查了接受妇科剖腹手术患者麻醉期间使用的麻醉性镇痛药剂量、术后24小时内镇痛药和呕吐的给药频率,以及术后第1小时和第18小时的数字评分量表(NRS)。16例患者(硬膜外组)采用七氟醚维持麻醉,并单次硬膜外注射6 - 12 ml含2 - 4 mg吗啡的0.375 - 0.75%罗哌卡因,另外16例患者(腹横肌平面阻滞组)采用超声引导双侧腹横肌平面阻滞,分别注射20 ml 0.375%罗哌卡因。
两组患者在年龄、身高、体重、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况、术中失血量和手术时间方面无显著差异。腹横肌平面阻滞组麻醉期间瑞芬太尼和芬太尼的总给药剂量均显著高于硬膜外组。硬膜外组术后呕吐次数较多。然而,两组术后第1小时和第18小时的NRS无显著差异。与硬膜外注射相比,超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞技术相对容易,并且在接受抗凝治疗的患者中腹横肌平面阻滞在可行性方面具有优势。
本研究中两组术后NRS无显著差异,这表明腹横肌平面阻滞联合适当的术后疼痛处理对硬膜外穿刺禁忌的患者有用。