Roberts Lindsey G, Dabbs Gretchen R
Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, 1000 Faner Drive, Mail Code 4502, Carbondale, IL, 62901.
J Forensic Sci. 2015 May;60(3):588-94. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12717. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
This research examined differences in decomposition rate and manner of domestic pig subjects (Sus scrofa) in never frozen (control) and previously frozen (experimental) research conditions. Eight control and experimental subjects were placed in an identical outdoor research environment. Daily quantitative and qualitative measurements were collected: abdominal circumference, total body score (TBS), temperature, photographs, descriptive decomposition stages, and visual observations. Field necropsies were performed at accumulated degree days (ADD) between 50 and 300 (Celsius). Paired samples t-tests of ADD to TBS >3.0, TBS >9.5, and TBS >16.0 indicate the rate of decomposition of experimental subjects was significantly slower than controls at both TBS >3 and >9.5 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively). A suite of qualitative indicators of predecomposition freezing is also reported. The differences between experimental and control subjects suggest previously frozen subjects should not be used in taphonomic research, as results do not accurately reflect the "normal" taphonomic condition.
本研究考察了家猪(Sus scrofa)在从未冷冻(对照)和先前冷冻(实验)的研究条件下分解速率和方式的差异。八只对照和实验对象被置于相同的户外研究环境中。每天收集定量和定性测量数据:腹围、总体评分(TBS)、温度、照片、描述性分解阶段和视觉观察。在累积度日(ADD)为50至300(摄氏度)时进行现场尸检。对ADD至TBS>3.0、TBS>9.5和TBS>16.0的配对样本t检验表明,在TBS>3和>9.5时,实验对象的分解速率均显著慢于对照对象(分别为p = 0.003和p = 0.002)。还报告了一组预分解冷冻的定性指标。实验对象和对照对象之间的差异表明,先前冷冻的对象不应用于埋藏学研究,因为结果不能准确反映“正常”的埋藏学状况。