Connor Melissa, Baigent Christiane, Hansen Eriek S
Forensic Investigation Research Station, Colorado Mesa University, 1100 North Ave, Grand Junction, CO, 81506.
Department of Biological Sciences, Forensic Investigation Research Station, Colorado Mesa University, 1100 North Avenue Grand Junction, Grand Junction, CO, 81501-7611.
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Sep;63(5):1350-1355. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13727. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Pigs are a common human analogue in taphonomic study, yet data comparing the trajectory of decomposition between the two groups are lacking. This study compared decomposition rate and gross tissue change in 17 pigs and 22 human remains placed in the Forensic Investigation Research Station in western Colorado between 2012 and 2015. Accumulated degree days (ADD) were used to assess the number of thermal units required to reach a given total body score (TBS) (1) which was used as the measure of decomposition. A comparison of slopes in linear mixed effects model indicated that decomposition rates significantly differed between human donors and pig remains χ = 5.662, p = 0.017. Neither the pig nor the human trajectory compared well to the TBS model. Thus, (i) pigs are not an adequate proxy for human decomposition studies, and (ii) in the semiarid environment of western Colorado, there is a need to develop a regional decomposition model.
在埋藏学研究中,猪是常用的人类模拟对象,但目前尚缺乏比较两组之间分解轨迹的数据。本研究比较了2012年至2015年间放置在科罗拉多州西部法医调查研究站的17头猪和22具人类遗体的分解速率和大体组织变化。累积度日(ADD)用于评估达到给定全身评分(TBS)所需的热量单位数量,该评分用作分解的衡量指标。线性混合效应模型中的斜率比较表明,人类捐赠者和猪遗体的分解速率存在显著差异(χ = 5.662,p = 0.017)。猪和人类的轨迹与TBS模型的拟合度均不佳。因此,(i)猪并非人类分解研究的合适替代物,(ii)在科罗拉多州西部的半干旱环境中,有必要开发区域分解模型。