Forbes Marisa N S, Finaughty Devin A, Miles Kelly L, Gibbon Victoria E
Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B., Canada; Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, W.C., South Africa.
Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, W.C., South Africa.
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Mar;296:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
In forensic death investigations, estimating the postmortem interval (PMI) is critical. An accurate PMI estimate increases the speed and accuracy of identifying the remains by narrowing the time frame in which the death occurred, thus reducing the pool of possible decedents. Cape Town, South Africa has a high level of unnatural death, and due to a burdened death investigation system, many remain unidentified. There has been a tendency to broadly apply quantitative models of decomposition across biogeographically unique circumstances. A prime example is the widespread application of the total body score (TBS)/accumulated degree day (ADD) model developed by Megyesi et al. (2005), later refined by Moffatt et al. (2016). However, the appropriateness of applying a single model to a wide range of locations with unique geography and climates remains in question. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of Megyesi and Moffatt models for estimating PMI in Cape Town, South Africa. Using pig carcasses, Finaughty established baseline data on the rates and patterns of terrestrial decomposition in summer and winter in two different locations in a forensically significant area of Cape Town. Among the baseline data, Finaughty derived TBS values using the Megyesi criteria. The present study used these values to estimate the ADD per the Megyesi and Moffatt models, which would correspond to an estimated PMI. These estimated values were compared to actual ADD values. Estimates of ADD were inaccurate for both models in winter, and only partially in summer. The Moffatt model was more accurate in earlier decomposition stages, with the Megyesi model more accurate in later decomposition stages. These results indicate the Cape Town environments may contain factors that the two models do not consider, producing inaccurate PMI estimations at various TBS' values. ADD does not depict the entire taphonomic story; the decomposition process appears to be too complex for universal modelling based on a single or narrow suite of variables. Seasonality was an important factor in determining the accuracy of the models, primarily resulting in underestimations of the true PMI values. These findings show the impracticality of applying models developed for- or in one region to any other and support the need to establish regionally-specific equations for estimating PMI in a forensic context. Alternatively, more complex models employing "big data" from a more comprehensive suite of variables which influence the rate and pattern of decay could be developed.
在法医死亡调查中,估计死后间隔时间(PMI)至关重要。准确估计PMI可通过缩小死亡发生的时间范围来提高识别遗体的速度和准确性,从而减少可能的死者范围。南非开普敦的非自然死亡发生率很高,而且由于死亡调查系统负担过重,许多遗体身份不明。在生物地理环境独特的情况下,存在广泛应用定量分解模型的趋势。一个典型例子是Megyesi等人(2005年)开发、后由Moffatt等人(2016年)完善的全身评分(TBS)/累积度日(ADD)模型的广泛应用。然而,将单一模型应用于具有独特地理和气候的广泛地区是否合适仍存在疑问。本研究的目的是评估和比较Megyesi模型和Moffatt模型在南非开普敦估计PMI的准确性。Finaughty利用猪尸体在开普敦一个具有法医意义地区的两个不同地点建立了夏季和冬季陆地分解速率和模式的基线数据。在这些基线数据中,Finaughty根据Megyesi标准得出TBS值。本研究使用这些值根据Megyesi模型和Moffatt模型估计ADD,这将对应于估计的PMI。将这些估计值与实际ADD值进行比较。两个模型在冬季对ADD的估计都不准确,在夏季也只是部分准确。Moffatt模型在早期分解阶段更准确,而Megyesi模型在后期分解阶段更准确。这些结果表明,开普敦的环境可能包含这两个模型未考虑的因素,在不同的TBS值下产生不准确的PMI估计。ADD并未描绘整个埋藏学情况;分解过程似乎过于复杂,无法基于单一或一套狭窄的变量进行通用建模。季节性是决定模型准确性的一个重要因素,主要导致对真实PMI值的低估。这些发现表明将为一个地区开发或在一个地区使用的模型应用于任何其他地区是不切实际的,并支持在法医背景下建立区域特定方程来估计PMI的必要性。或者,可以开发更复杂的模型,采用来自更全面变量集的“大数据”,这些变量会影响腐烂速率和模式。