• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Vascular access in hemodialyis patients - registry data.血液透析患者的血管通路——登记数据
Hippokratia. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):209-11.
2
[The Veneto Region's Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation: 2006-2007 report].[威尼托地区透析与移植登记处:2006 - 2007年报告]
G Ital Nefrol. 2009 Nov-Dec;26 Suppl 48:S5-56.
3
Utilization, patency, and complications associated with vascular access for hemodialysis in the United States.美国血液透析血管通路的利用、通畅性和相关并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1166-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.049.
4
Vascular access for hemodialysis: Current practice in Vietnam.血液透析的血管通路:越南的当前实践。
J Vasc Access. 2019 May;20(1_suppl):20-23. doi: 10.1177/1129729818771883. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
5
[Vascular accesses for chronic hemodialysis in children].[儿童慢性血液透析的血管通路]
Rev Med Chil. 1999 Jun;127(6):693-7.
6
Vascular Access and Risk of Bloodstream Infection Among Older Incident Hemodialysis Patients.老年初发血液透析患者的血管通路与血流感染风险
Kidney Med. 2020 Mar 16;2(3):276-285. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.12.010. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
7
Vascular access conversion and patient outcome after hemodialysis initiation with a nonfunctional arteriovenous access: a prospective registry-based study.血液透析开始时使用无功能动静脉通路后的血管通路转换与患者结局:一项基于前瞻性注册研究
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Feb 22;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0492-y.
8
Approach to vascular access for hemodialysis: experiences from the Republic of Macedonia.血液透析的血管通路建立方法:来自马其顿共和国的经验
Int J Artif Organs. 2002 May;25(5):354-64. doi: 10.1177/039139880202500503.
9
Trends in hemodialysis vascular access from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005.2000年至2005年澳大利亚和新西兰透析与移植登记处(ANZDATA)血液透析血管通路的趋势
Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Oct;50(4):612-21. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.016.
10
Vascular access for incident hemodialysis patients in Catalonia: analysis of data from the Catalan Renal Registry (2000-2011).加泰罗尼亚地区初发血液透析患者的血管通路:来自加泰罗尼亚肾脏登记处(2000 - 2011年)的数据分析
J Vasc Access. 2015 Nov-Dec;16(6):472-9. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000410. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Vascular access registry of Serbia: a 4-year experience.塞尔维亚血管通路登记处:4年经验
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Feb;49(2):319-324. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1378-9. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
2
The impact of Vascular Access on the Adequacy of Dialysis and the Outcome of the Dialysis Treatment: One Center Experience.血管通路对透析充分性及透析治疗结局的影响:单中心经验
Mater Sociomed. 2015 Apr;27(2):114-7. doi: 10.5455/msm.2015.27.4-114-117. Epub 2015 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
[Types of hemodialysis vascular access in patients on renal replacement therapy and its complications during a one year observation period].[肾脏替代治疗患者的血液透析血管通路类型及其在一年观察期内的并发症]
Przegl Lek. 2011;68(7):343-7.
2
Efficiency of the kidney disease outcomes quality initiative guidelines for preemptive vascular access in an academic setting.在学术环境中,肾脏病结局质量倡议指南对血管前置的效率。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):760-5; discussion 765-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
3
Slovenian Renal Replacement Therapy Registry: excerpts from the 2008 Annual Report.斯洛文尼亚肾脏替代治疗注册中心:2008年度报告摘录。
Ther Apher Dial. 2011 Jun;15(3):228-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.00942.x.
4
Vascular access for dialysis in the United States: progress, hurdles, controversies, and the future.美国透析的血管通路:进展、障碍、争议与未来。
Semin Dial. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):614-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2010.00797.x. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
5
Gender differences in vascular access in hemodialysis patients in the United States: developing strategies for improving access outcome.美国血液透析患者血管通路的性别差异:制定改善通路结局的策略
Gend Med. 2007 Sep;4(3):193-204. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80040-4.
6
Haemodialysis vascular access problems in Canada: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS II).加拿大血液透析血管通路问题:透析结果与实践模式研究(DOPPS II)的结果
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Mar;21(3):721-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi281. Epub 2005 Nov 25.
7
Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS.欧美地区血管通路的使用情况:透析预后与实践模式研究(DOPPS)的结果
Kidney Int. 2002 Jan;61(1):305-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00117.x.

血液透析患者的血管通路——登记数据

Vascular access in hemodialyis patients - registry data.

作者信息

Stojceva-Taneva O, Selim G

机构信息

University Clinic of Nephrology, Medical Faculty of Skopje, University "Sts. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje, FYR of Macedonia.

出版信息

Hippokratia. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):209-11.

PMID:25694752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4309138/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of arteriovenous fistula over a central venous catheter in hemodialysis patients is recommended whenever possible. It has become the gold standard among all the available permanent vascular accesses for hemodialysis as it is associated with less complications. The aim of our study was to analyze the type of vascular access in hemodialysis patients in our country, FYR of Macedonia and to see its association with other variables recorded by the National Renal Registry in 2009.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected by 18 hemodialysis centers in the country. A total of 1,457 patients were analyzed. One hundred and ninety one patients were incident, and 164 out of 1,457 died during the year. Except for 9 patients, all the others had data on type of vascular access, as well as data on any vascular access intervention performed during the year.

RESULTS

The overall mean age was 58.8 ± 13.1 years. Eighty-nine percent of the non-incident patients (prevalent plus those who died during the year) had arteriovenous fistula, 10.6% central venous catheter and 0.2% vascular graft. When incident to non-incident patients were compared, incident patients were significantly older, had significantly higher mortality and significantly lower percentage of arteriovenous fistula. Patients with arteriovenous fistula had significantly longer dialysis vintage and significantly less deaths compared to those with central venous catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that the number of non-incident hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula in the country was high. The incident hemodialysis patients have high number of central venous catheters as vascular access for hemodialysis and significantly higher mortality compared to non-incident patients. Hippokratia 2014; 18 (3): 209-211.

摘要

背景

对于血液透析患者,只要有可能,建议优先使用动静脉内瘘而非中心静脉导管。由于其并发症较少,动静脉内瘘已成为所有可用的永久性血液透析血管通路中的金标准。我们研究的目的是分析马其顿共和国我国血液透析患者的血管通路类型,并观察其与2009年国家肾脏登记处记录的其他变量之间的关联。

材料与方法

数据由该国18个血液透析中心收集。共分析了1457例患者。191例为新发病例,1457例中有164例在该年度死亡。除9例患者外,其他所有患者均有血管通路类型数据以及该年度进行的任何血管通路干预的数据。

结果

总体平均年龄为58.8±13.1岁。89%的非新发病例患者(包括现患病例和该年度死亡患者)使用动静脉内瘘,10.6%使用中心静脉导管,0.2%使用血管移植物。将新发病例患者与非新发病例患者进行比较时,新发病例患者年龄显著更大,死亡率显著更高,动静脉内瘘的比例显著更低。与使用中心静脉导管的患者相比,使用动静脉内瘘的患者透析时间显著更长,死亡人数显著更少。

结论

该研究表明,该国非新发病例的血液透析患者中使用动静脉内瘘的人数较多。新发病例的血液透析患者使用中心静脉导管作为血液透析血管通路的比例较高,且与非新发病例患者相比死亡率显著更高。《希波克拉底》2014年;18(3):209 - 211。