Bianchi Vincenza, Premaschi Simone, Raspagni Alessia, Secco Serena, Vidali Matteo
Toxicology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
School of Medicine, Insubria University, Varese, Italy.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2015 May;50(3):266-70. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv005. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
In heavy alcohol consumption laboratory tests represent an objective evidence. In this study we compared older and newer biomarkers in blood and in hair.
Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT), ethyl glucuronide (EtG), AST, ALT, GGT, MCV were measured in a large sample (n = 562). All people declared no alcohol consumption within the last 3 months. Serum CDT was measured by the candidate HPLC reference method and expressed as relative amount of disialotransferrin (%DST: cutoff 1.7%). EtG was measured in hair by a validated in-house method by LC-MS/MS (cutoff 30 pg/mg).
Respectively, 42 (7.5%) and 76 (13.5%) subjects were positive to CDT and EtG. In particular, 30 (5.3%) subjects were positive to both tests, 12 (2.1%) only to CDT, while 46 (8.2%) only to EtG. The agreement (positive and negative pairs) between CDT and EtG was 89.7%. Interestingly, 6 out of 12 (50%) CDT-positive subjects had EtG < 15 pg/mg, whereas 27 out of 46 (59%) EtG-positive subjects had CDT < 1.1%. Forty-one out of 76 (54%) EtG-positive subjects display EtG values within 30-50 pg/mg.
Large variability exists between CDT and EtG in detecting chronic alcohol consumption. We suggest to use CDT, or a combination of different biomarkers, to identify alcohol abuse in a forensic context. EtG results close to the cutoff (30-50 pg/mg) should be cautiously considered before any sanction is assigned.
在重度饮酒的实验室检测中,结果代表客观证据。在本研究中,我们比较了血液和头发中较新和较旧的生物标志物。
在一个大样本(n = 562)中测量了缺糖转铁蛋白(CDT)、葡萄糖醛酸乙酯(EtG)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、平均红细胞体积(MCV)。所有受试者均宣称在过去3个月内未饮酒。血清CDT采用候选高效液相色谱参考方法测量,并表示为双唾液酸转铁蛋白的相对含量(%DST:临界值1.7%)。头发中的EtG采用经过验证的内部液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测量(临界值30 pg/mg)。
分别有42名(7.5%)和76名(13.5%)受试者CDT和EtG呈阳性。具体而言,30名(5.3%)受试者两项检测均呈阳性,12名(2.1%)仅CDT呈阳性,而46名(8.2%)仅EtG呈阳性。CDT和EtG之间的一致性(阳性和阴性配对)为89.7%。有趣的是,12名CDT阳性受试者中有6名(50%)EtG<15 pg/mg,而46名EtG阳性受试者中有27名(59%)CDT<1.1%。76名EtG阳性受试者中有41名(54%)的EtG值在30 - 50 pg/mg之间。
CDT和EtG在检测慢性饮酒方面存在很大差异。我们建议在法医背景下使用CDT或不同生物标志物的组合来识别酒精滥用。在做出任何处罚之前,对于接近临界值(30 - 50 pg/mg)的EtG结果应谨慎考虑。