Ricci William M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar;29(3):130-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000282.
Successful treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures, like all fractures, requires careful attention to understand the fracture pattern nuances, identifying and executing a rational treatment approach, and providing an appropriate postoperative recovery protocol. Unlike most other fractures, modification of standard techniques is often required to obtain a stable fixation construct, and there is a greater role for revision arthroplasty in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. Optimal indications for surgical repair versus revision arthroplasty and optimal postoperative weight-bearing protocols remain uncertain. Reported outcomes for patients with periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures are generally good and are relatively consistent. Results for periprosthetic distal femur fractures, however, are less good and more inconsistent. Both periprosthetic femoral shaft and distal femur fractures are associated with relatively high mortality rates, approaching that of patients with hip fractures. This review should provide insight into the current solutions and challenges for the treatment of patients with periprosthetic femur fractures.
与所有骨折一样,成功治疗人工关节周围股骨骨折需要仔细关注以了解骨折模式的细微差别,确定并实施合理的治疗方法,并提供适当的术后康复方案。与大多数其他骨折不同,通常需要对标准技术进行调整以获得稳定的固定结构,并且翻修关节成形术在人工关节周围骨折的治疗中作用更大。手术修复与翻修关节成形术的最佳适应证以及最佳术后负重方案仍不明确。人工关节周围股骨干骨折患者的报告结果总体良好且相对一致。然而,人工关节周围股骨远端骨折的结果较差且更不一致。人工关节周围股骨干和股骨远端骨折均与相对较高的死亡率相关,接近髋部骨折患者的死亡率。本综述应能深入了解人工关节周围股骨骨折患者治疗的当前解决方案和挑战。