Suppr超能文献

追踪反复思考:视觉词汇判断过程中的连续和离散修订过程

Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.

作者信息

Barca Laura, Pezzulo Giovanni

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Feb 20;10(2):e0116193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116193. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

We studied the dynamics of lexical decisions by asking participants to categorize lexical and nonlexical stimuli and recording their mouse movements toward response buttons during the choice. In a previous report we revealed greater trajectory curvature and attraction to competitors for Low Frequency words and Pseudowords. This analysis did not clarify whether the trajectory curvature in the two conditions was due to a continuous dynamic competition between the response alternatives or if a discrete revision process (a "change of mind") took place during the choice from an initially selected response to the opposite one. To disentangle these two possibilities, here we analyse the velocity and acceleration profiles of mouse movements during the choice. Pseudowords' peak movement velocity occurred with 100 ms delay with respect to words and Letters Strings. Acceleration profile for High and Low Frequency words and Letters Strings exhibited a butterfly plot with one acceleration peak at 400 ms and one deceleration peak at 650 ms. Differently, Pseudowords' acceleration profile had double positive peaks (at 400 and 600 ms) followed by movement deceleration, in correspondence with changes in the decision from lexical to nonlexical response buttons. These results speak to different online processes during the categorization of Low Frequency words and Pseudowords, with a continuous competition process for the former and a discrete revision process for the latter.

摘要

我们通过要求参与者对词汇和非词汇刺激进行分类,并记录他们在选择过程中鼠标向响应按钮移动的动作,来研究词汇判断的动态过程。在之前的一份报告中,我们发现低频词和伪词的轨迹曲率更大,且对竞争选项有吸引力。该分析并未阐明这两种情况下的轨迹曲率是由于响应选项之间持续的动态竞争,还是在从最初选择的响应转向相反响应的过程中发生了离散的修正过程(“改变主意”)。为了厘清这两种可能性,我们在此分析了选择过程中鼠标移动的速度和加速度曲线。伪词的峰值移动速度相对于单词和字母串延迟100毫秒出现。高频词、低频词和字母串的加速度曲线呈现出一个蝶形图,在400毫秒时有一个加速度峰值,在650毫秒时有一个减速度峰值。不同的是,伪词的加速度曲线有两个正峰值(分别在400毫秒和600毫秒),随后是移动减速,这与从词汇响应按钮到非词汇响应按钮的决策变化相对应。这些结果表明,在低频词和伪词的分类过程中存在不同的在线过程,前者是一个持续的竞争过程,后者是一个离散的修正过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b84f/4336137/d2311823ce32/pone.0116193.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验