Dodds Seth D, Grey Monique A, Bohl Daniel D, Mahoney Eamonn M, DeLuca Peter A
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 800 Howard Ave., New Haven, CT, 06519, USA,
J Child Orthop. 2015 Feb;9(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0642-3. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
This study compares clinical and radiographic outcomes of operatively managed pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures between patients treated by pediatric orthopedists (POs) and patients treated by non-pediatric orthopedists (NPOs).
A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with surgically managed supracondylar humerus fractures was conducted. For clinical outcomes analyses, 3 months of clinical follow-up were required, resulting in a sample size of 90 patients (33 treated by NPOs, 57 by POs). For radiographic outcomes analyses, 3 months of both clinical and radiographic follow-up were required, resulting in a sample size of 57 patients (23 treated by NPOs, 34 by POs).
The rate of inadequate fracture fixation was higher for patients treated by NPOs (43.5 %) than for patients treated by POs (14.7 %; p = 0.030), but rates of clinical complications, malreduction, and postoperative loss of reduction did not differ. Treatment with open reduction was more common for patients treated by NPOs (33.3 %) than for patients treated by POs (3.5 %; p < 0.001). Total operating room time was longer for patients treated by NPOs (110.9 min) than for patients treated by POs (82.9 min; p < 0.001).
While patients treated by POs differed from patients treated by NPOs with respect to several intermediate outcomes, including having a lower rate of open reduction and a lower rate of inadequate fracture fixation, there were no differences between POs and NPOs in the rates of the more meaningful and definitive outcomes, including clinical complications, malreduction, and postoperative loss of reduction.
本研究比较了由小儿骨科医生(POs)治疗的患儿与由非小儿骨科医生(NPOs)治疗的患儿手术治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折的临床和影像学结果。
对手术治疗肱骨髁上骨折的小儿患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。对于临床结果分析,需要3个月的临床随访,最终样本量为90例患者(33例由NPOs治疗,57例由POs治疗)。对于影像学结果分析,需要3个月的临床和影像学随访,最终样本量为57例患者(23例由NPOs治疗,34例由POs治疗)。
NPOs治疗的患者骨折固定不充分的发生率(43.5%)高于POs治疗的患者(14.7%;p = 0.030),但临床并发症、复位不良和术后复位丢失率并无差异。NPOs治疗的患者采用切开复位的比例(33.3%)高于POs治疗的患者(3.5%;p < 0.001)。NPOs治疗的患者总手术室时间(110.9分钟)长于POs治疗的患者(82.9分钟;p < 0.001)。
虽然POs治疗的患者与NPOs治疗的患者在一些中间结果方面存在差异,包括切开复位率较低和骨折固定不充分率较低,但在更有意义和确定性的结果方面,包括临床并发症、复位不良和术后复位丢失率方面,POs和NPOs之间并无差异。