Singh Vivek, Simcox Trevor, Aggarwal Vinay K, Schwarzkopf Ran, Long William J
NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
NYU Winthrop Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mineola, NY, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Feb 26;8:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.01.007. eCollection 2021 Apr.
An adult reconstruction (AR) fellowship is designed to provide advanced training for a broad range of primary reconstructive and complex knee revision surgeries. This study aims to identify outcome differences between primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed by AR fellowship-trained surgeons and non-AR (NAR) fellowship-trained surgeons.
We retrospectively reviewed 7415 patients who underwent primary TKA from 2016 to 2020. Two cohorts were established based on whether the operation was performed by an AR or NAR fellowship-trained surgeon. Demographic, clinical data, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at various time-points (preoperatively, 3 months, 1 year). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and independent sample -tests. Primary outcomes were compared using multilinear regressions, controlling for demographic differences.
AR surgeons performed 5194 (70%) cases while NAR surgeons performed 2221 (30%) cases. Surgical time (minutes) significantly differed between the 2 groups (101.26 vs 111.56; < .001). Length of stay, 90-day all-cause readmissions, revisions, and all-cause emergency department visits did not statistically differ ( = .079, = .978, = .094, and = .241, respectively). AR surgeons were more likely to discharge their patients home than NAR surgeons ( = .001). NAR group reported lower KOOS, JR scores at 3 months and 1 year (preop: 45.30 vs 45.79, = .728; 3 months: 64.73 vs 59.47, < .001; 1 year: 71.66 vs 69.56, = .234); however, only 3-month scores statistically differed. Veterans RAND-12 Physical and Mental components scores (VR-12 PCS and MCS) were not statistically significant at any time-point between the cohorts. Delta-improvements preoperatively to 1 year in KOOS, JR (26.36 vs 23.77; < .001) and VR-12 PCS (11.98 vs 10.62; < .001) scores were significantly higher for the AR cohort but did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference.
This study demonstrates significantly shorter surgical times and greater improvements in KOOS, JR and VR-12 PCS scores associated with TKAs performed by AR fellowship-trained surgeons.
Retrospective Cohort Study.
成人重建(AR) fellowship旨在为广泛的初次重建和复杂膝关节翻修手术提供高级培训。本研究旨在确定由接受AR fellowship培训的外科医生进行的初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)与未接受AR(NAR) fellowship培训的外科医生进行的手术之间的结果差异。
我们回顾性分析了2016年至2020年接受初次TKA的7415例患者。根据手术是否由接受AR或NAR fellowship培训的外科医生进行,建立了两个队列。在不同时间点(术前、3个月、1年)收集人口统计学、临床数据和患者报告的结局指标。使用卡方检验和独立样本检验评估人口统计学差异。使用多线性回归比较主要结局,并控制人口统计学差异。
AR外科医生进行了5194例(70%)手术,而NAR外科医生进行了2221例(30%)手术。两组之间的手术时间(分钟)有显著差异(101.26对111.56;P <.001)。住院时间、90天全因再入院率、翻修率和全因急诊科就诊率在统计学上没有差异(分别为P =.079、P =.978、P =.094和P =.241)。与NAR外科医生相比,AR外科医生更有可能让患者出院回家(P =.001)。NAR组在3个月和1年时报告的KOOS、JR评分较低(术前:45.30对45.79,P =.728;3个月:64.73对59.47,P <.001;1年:71.66对69.56,P =.234);然而,只有3个月时的评分在统计学上有差异。退伍军人RAND-12身体和心理成分评分(VR-12 PCS和MCS)在队列之间的任何时间点都没有统计学意义。AR队列术前至1年的KOOS、JR(26.36对23.77;P <.001)和VR-12 PCS(11.98对10.62;P <.001)评分的改善幅度显著更高,但未超过最小临床重要差异。
本研究表明,接受AR fellowship培训的外科医生进行的TKA手术时间显著缩短,KOOS、JR和VR-12 PCS评分有更大改善。
回顾性队列研究。