Hoffman Joshua T, McNally Michael P, Wordeman Samuel C, Hewett Timothy E
Sports Health and Performance Institute (SHPI) OSU Sports Medicine, The Ohio State University, 2050 Kenny Rd, Suite 3100, Columbus, OH 43221, USA.
Sports Health and Performance Institute (SHPI) OSU Sports Medicine, The Ohio State University, 2050 Kenny Rd, Suite 3100, Columbus, OH 43221, USA; Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; School of Health and Rehabilitative Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Biomech. 2015 Apr 13;48(6):1224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.035. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) marker occlusion commonly occurs during three-dimensional (3-D) motion capture of dynamic tasks with deep hip flexion. The purpose of this study was to validate a universal technique to correct ASIS occlusion. 420 ms of bilateral ASIS marker occlusion was simulated in fourteen drop vertical jump (DVJ) trials (n=14). Kinematic and kinetic hip data calculated for pelvic segments based on iliac crest (IC) marker and virtual ASIS (produced by our algorithm and a commercial virtual join) trajectories were compared to true ASIS marker tracking data. Root mean squared errors (RMSEs; mean±standard deviation) and intra-class correlations (ICCs) between pelvic tracking based on virtual ASIS trajectories filled by our algorithm and true ASIS position were 2.3±0.9° (ICC=0.982) flexion/extension, 0.8±0.2° (ICC=0.954) abduction/adduction for hip angles, and 0.40±0.17 N m (ICC=1.000) and 1.05±0.36 N m (ICC=0.998) for sagittal and frontal plane moments. RMSEs for IC pelvic tracking were 6.9±1.8° (ICC=0.888) flexion/extension, 0.8±0.3° (ICC=0.949) abduction/adduction for hip angles, and 0.31±0.13 N m (ICC=1.00) and 1.48±0.69 N m (ICC=0.996) for sagittal and frontal plane moments. Finally, the commercially-available virtual join demonstrated RMSEs of 4.4±1.5° (ICC=0.945) flexion/extension, 0.7±0.2° (ICC=0.972) abduction/adduction for hip angles, and 0.97±0.62 N m (ICC=1.000) and 1.49±0.67 N m (ICC=0.996) for sagittal and frontal plane moments. The presented algorithm exceeded the a priori ICC cutoff of 0.95 for excellent validity and is an acceptable tracking alternative. While ICCs for the commercially available virtual join did not exhibit excellent correlation, good validity was observed for all kinematics and kinetics. IC marker pelvic tracking is not a valid alternative.
在前上棘(ASIS)标记遮挡通常发生在深度髋关节屈曲的动态任务的三维(3-D)运动捕捉过程中。本研究的目的是验证一种通用技术来纠正ASIS遮挡。在十四次垂直下落跳(DVJ)试验(n = 14)中模拟了420毫秒的双侧ASIS标记遮挡。将基于髂嵴(IC)标记和虚拟ASIS(由我们的算法和商业虚拟关节生成)轨迹计算的骨盆节段的运动学和动力学髋关节数据与真实ASIS标记跟踪数据进行比较。基于我们算法填充的虚拟ASIS轨迹的骨盆跟踪与真实ASIS位置之间的均方根误差(RMSEs;均值±标准差)和组内相关性(ICCs)为:髋关节屈伸角度2.3±0.9°(ICC = 0.982),外展/内收角度0.8±0.2°(ICC = 0.954),矢状面和额状面力矩分别为0.40±0.17 N·m(ICC = 1.000)和1.05±0.36 N·m(ICC = 0.998)。IC骨盆跟踪的RMSEs为:髋关节屈伸角度6.9±1.8°(ICC = 0.888),外展/内收角度0.8±0.3°(ICC = 0.949),矢状面和额状面力矩分别为0.31±0.13 N·m(ICC = 1.00)和1.48±0.69 N·m(ICC = 0.996)。最后,市售的虚拟关节的RMSEs为:髋关节屈伸角度4.4±1.5°(ICC = 0.945),外展/内收角度0.7±0.2°(ICC = 0.972),矢状面和额状面力矩分别为0.97±0.62 N·m(ICC = 1.000)和1.49±0.67 N·m(ICC = 0.996)。所提出的算法超过了优秀有效性的先验ICC截止值0.95,是一种可接受的跟踪替代方法。虽然市售虚拟关节的ICCs没有表现出极好的相关性,但在所有运动学和动力学方面都观察到了良好的有效性。IC标记骨盆跟踪不是一种有效的替代方法。