Mid-head resection of hip using resurfacing prosthesis.
作者信息
Jiang Wen-xue
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedics, the First Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.
出版信息
Orthop Surg. 2015 Feb;7(1):85-6. doi: 10.1111/os.12156.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Mid-head resection of hip using resurfacing prosthesis.
Orthop Surg. 2015 Feb;7(1):85-6. doi: 10.1111/os.12156.
2
Birmingham Mid-Head Resection hip arthroplasty in a young man with gigantism.
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Feb;27(2):324.e13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.034. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
3
Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
Scand J Surg. 2018 Jun;107(2):180-186. doi: 10.1177/1457496917748220. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
4
A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham Mid-Head Resection device.
Orthopedics. 2008 Dec;31(12 Suppl 2).
5
Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Dec;82(974):802-5. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.044594.
6
CORR Insights(®): frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3779-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4405-8. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
7
[Hip resurfacing - manually and intellectually challenging].
Orthopade. 2008 Jul;37(7):625. doi: 10.1007/s00132-008-1278-5.
8
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Scand J Surg. 2014 Mar;103(1):54-9. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495345. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
9
Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement-the value of a randomized clinical trial.
Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Apr;36(2):195-201, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.12.001.
10
The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):469-76. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22967.
本文引用的文献
1
Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow-up.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jun;90(6):715-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.19875.
2
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in developmental dysplasia: a case-control study.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jun;90(6):708-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20026.
3
The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):436-41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648.
4
The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Nov;89(11):1431-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19336.
5
A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Sep;89(9):1140-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18367.
6
Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:91-8. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000192034.37049.83.
7
Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Apr;87(4):463-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15498.
8
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;87(2):167-70. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.15030.
9
Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Mar;86(2):172-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.14371.
10
Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug(329 Suppl):S89-98. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608001-00009.
Zotero 插件