Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Institute of Neurosciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Sep;1299:1-10. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12131.
The criminal cases of Anders Breivik, the Norwegian shooter, and Bernard Madoff, the fraudulent American financier, are used as prominent examples of the complexity that courts have to explore when judging the severity and responsibility of felonies performed by different types of psychopaths. I outline the brain circuits subserving morally charged decisions in ordinary citizens and in patients with gross lesions in the same areas, along with singularities in these brain systems that have been detected in psychopaths. These neural signatures, combined with thorough neuropsychological examination, will hopefully improve the diagnoses and prognoses of criminals with dangerous psychopathic traits. In this respect, the profiles of incarcerated members of gangs are used to exemplify and distinguish among typical niches and varieties of psychopathy within criminal organizations. A discussion follows, presenting the complexities of novel research that is increasing the sophistication of these challenging but key intersections between neuroscience and law.
挪威枪手安德斯·布雷维克和美国欺诈性金融家伯纳德·麦道夫的刑事案件被用作突出的例子,说明了法院在判断不同类型的精神病患者所犯的重罪的严重程度和责任时所必须探讨的复杂性。我概述了在普通公民和在同一区域有严重病变的患者中进行有道德意义的决策所依赖的大脑回路,以及在精神病患者中检测到的这些大脑系统的特殊性。这些神经特征,结合彻底的神经心理学检查,有望改善具有危险精神病特征的罪犯的诊断和预后。在这方面,被监禁的帮派成员的特征被用来举例说明和区分犯罪组织内的典型和各种精神病类型。随后进行了讨论,介绍了正在增加这些具有挑战性但关键的神经科学和法律交叉点的复杂性的新研究的复杂性。