• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜及手术治疗结直肠恶性息肉:一项基于人群的对比研究。

Endoscopic and surgical treatment of malignant colorectal polyps: a population-based comparative study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Arizona Center for Digestive Health, Gilbert, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):733-740.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.049.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.049
PMID:25708762
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term population-based data comparing endoscopic therapy (ET) and surgery for management of malignant colorectal polyps (MCPs) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific survival with ET and surgery.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Population-based study.

PATIENTS

Patients with stage 0 and stage 1 MCPs were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1998-2009). Demographic characteristics, tumor size, location, treatment modality, and survival were compared. Propensity-score matching and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between treatment and CRC-specific survival.

INTERVENTIONS

ET and surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Mid-term (2.5 years) and long-term (5 years) CRC-free survival rates and independent predictors of CRC-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Of 10,403 patients with MCPs, 2688 (26%) underwent ET and 7715 (74%) underwent surgery. Patients undergoing ET were more likely to be older white men with stage 0 disease. Surgical patients had more right-sided lesions, larger MCPs, and stage 1 disease. There was no difference in the 2.5-year and 5-year CRC-free survival rates between the 2 groups in stage 0 disease. Surgical resection led to higher 2.5-year (97.8% vs 93.2%; P < .001) and 5-year (96.6% vs 89.8%; P < .001) CRC-free survival in stage 1 disease. These results were confirmed by propensity-score matching. ET was a significant predictor for CRC-specific mortality in stage 1 disease (hazard ratio 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-3.29; P < .001).

LIMITATIONS

Comorbidity index not available, selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

ET and surgery had comparable mid- and long-term CRC-free survival rates in stage 0 disease. Surgical resection is the recommended treatment modality for MCPs with submucosal invasion.

摘要

背景

长期的基于人群的数据比较内镜治疗(ET)和手术治疗恶性结直肠息肉(MCP)的效果有限。

目的

比较 ET 和手术治疗结直肠癌(CRC)特异性生存。

设计和设置

基于人群的研究。

患者

从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(1998-2009 年)中确定 0 期和 1 期 MCP 患者。比较人口统计学特征、肿瘤大小、位置、治疗方式和生存情况。采用倾向评分匹配和 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估治疗与 CRC 特异性生存之间的关系。

干预措施

ET 和手术。

主要观察指标

中期(2.5 年)和长期(5 年)CRC 无复发生存率以及 CRC 特异性死亡率的独立预测因素。

结果

在 10403 例 MCP 患者中,2688 例(26%)接受了 ET,7715 例(74%)接受了手术。接受 ET 的患者更有可能是 0 期疾病的老年白人男性。手术组患者的病变更偏右侧,肿瘤更大,疾病分期为 1 期。在 0 期疾病中,两组 2.5 年和 5 年 CRC 无复发生存率无差异。手术切除可显著提高 2.5 年(97.8%比 93.2%;P <.001)和 5 年(96.6%比 89.8%;P <.001)CRC 无复发生存率,这一结果在倾向评分匹配后仍然成立。ET 是 1 期疾病 CRC 特异性死亡的显著预测因素(风险比 2.40;95%置信区间,1.75-3.29;P <.001)。

局限性

无法获取合并症指数,存在选择偏倚。

结论

ET 和手术在 0 期疾病中具有相似的中期和长期 CRC 无复发生存率。对于黏膜下侵犯的 MCP,手术切除是推荐的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic and surgical treatment of malignant colorectal polyps: a population-based comparative study.内镜及手术治疗结直肠恶性息肉:一项基于人群的对比研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):733-740.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.049.
2
Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study.漏诊或间隔期结直肠癌的特征和患者生存:一项基于人群的研究。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):950-60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
3
Surgical Resection of the Primary Tumor in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Without Metastasectomy is Associated With Improved Overall Survival Compared With Chemotherapy/Radiation Therapy Alone.与单纯化疗/放疗相比,IV期结直肠癌患者在未行转移灶切除术时进行原发肿瘤的手术切除与总生存期改善相关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Apr;59(4):299-305. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000546.
4
Relationship between model for end-stage liver disease score and 30-day outcomes for patients undergoing elective colorectal resections: an American college of surgeons-national surgical quality improvement program study.终末期肝病模型评分与择期结直肠切除术患者30天预后的关系:一项美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 May;58(5):494-501. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000358.
5
Survival outcome of local excision versus radical resection of colon or rectal carcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study.局部切除与根治性切除结肠癌或直肠癌的生存结局:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)的人群研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):563-9; discussion 569-71. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e85a.
6
Impact of chronic kidney disease on postoperative outcome following colorectal cancer surgery.慢性肾脏病对结直肠癌手术后术后结局的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):879-85. doi: 10.1111/codi.12665.
7
Synchronous polyps predict metachronous colorectal lesions after curative resection of colorectal cancer.同步性息肉可预测结直肠癌根治性切除术后的异时性结直肠病变。
Acta Chir Belg. 2016 Aug;116(4):225-230. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1171075. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Survival of elderly persons undergoing colonoscopy: implications for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.接受结肠镜检查的老年人的生存率:对结直肠癌筛查和监测的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Sep;66(3):544-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.008.
9
Comparative effectiveness of chemotherapy vs resection of the primary tumour as the initial treatment in older patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer.化疗与原发性肿瘤切除术作为老年IV期结直肠癌患者初始治疗的比较疗效
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jun;19(6):O210-O218. doi: 10.1111/codi.13659.
10
A large-scale multicenter study of long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer.一项内镜下切除治疗黏膜下浸润性结直肠癌的长期结局的大规模多中心研究。
Endoscopy. 2013 Sep;45(9):718-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344234. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgical Submucosal Dissection: An Efficient Treatment Option for Giant Superficial Neoplastic Lesions of the Rectum.经肛门内镜显微外科黏膜下剥离术:一种治疗直肠巨大浅表性肿瘤性病变的有效方法。
Visc Med. 2022 Aug;38(4):282-287. doi: 10.1159/000522367. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Impact of Salvage Surgery following Colonic Endoscopic Polypectomy for Patients with Invasive Neoplasia.结直肠内镜息肉切除术治疗浸润性肿瘤患者中挽救性手术的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Apr 29;29(5):3138-3148. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050255.
3
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.
结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术:最佳实践的最新进展
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 3;14:317-330. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S249869. eCollection 2021.
4
Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer.早期胃肠道癌内镜切除临床实践指南。
Intest Res. 2021 Apr;19(2):127-157. doi: 10.5217/ir.2020.00020. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
5
Week 2020 Poster Presentations.2020年第20周海报展示。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8_suppl):144-887. doi: 10.1177/2050640620927345.
6
Recurrence, death risk, and related factors in patients with stage 0 colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based study.0期结直肠癌患者的复发、死亡风险及相关因素:一项基于全国人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e21688. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021688.
7
Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer.早期胃肠道癌内镜切除临床实践指南
Clin Endosc. 2020 Mar;53(2):142-166. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.032. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
8
Polypectomy versus surgery in early colon cancer: size and location of colon cancer affect long-term survival.早期结肠癌的息肉切除术与手术治疗:结肠癌的大小和位置影响长期生存率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1349-1357. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3101-z. Epub 2018 Jun 24.