Suppr超能文献

激光荧光与咬合翼片X线摄影术检测乳牙近中龋的比较:一项体内研究

Comparison of Proximal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth between Laser Fluorescence and Bitewing Radiography: An in vivo Study.

作者信息

Mepparambath Ratheesh, S Bhat Sham, K Hegde Sundeep, Anjana G, Sunil M, Mathew Sherryl

机构信息

Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala, India.

Professor and Head, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Sep-Dec;7(3):163-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1257. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Proximal caries detection is of great importance because of the rapid rate of caries progression and the difficulty in determining the absence or presence of a lesion in primary dentition. Although, various methods for caries diagnosis offer good diagnostic performances, they provide varying sensitivities for detecting proximal carious lesions. The objective of this study was to compare, in vivo, the accuracy of DIAGNOdent and bitewing radiography at detecting proximal caries in primary teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One Hundred and one primary maxillary and mandibular molars without obvious cavities of children between the age group of 3 and 10 years were included. The teeth were first subjected to DIAGNOdent examination followed by bitewing radiography. The specificity and sensitivity of the systems were calculated.

RESULTS

At the dentin caries (D3) level, the sensitivity of DIAGNOdent and bitewing radiography was 78.5%; at the enamel caries (D1 and D2) level it was 39.12% and for the sound teeth (D0) it was found to be 76.52%. A strong association was observed between the DIAGNOdent and the bitewing radiograph (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The DIAGNOdent can be used as an alternative diagnostic method in detection of proximal caries in primary teeth. But when seen at the each caries level, the DIAGNOdent is more accurate at the D0 and D3 threshold. How to cite this article: Mepparambath R, Bhat SS, Hegde SK, Anjana G, Sunil M, Mathew S. Comparison of Proximal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth between Laser Fluorescence and Bitewing Radiography: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(3):163-167.

摘要

背景与目的

由于龋病进展迅速且难以确定乳牙中龋损的有无,近端龋的检测至关重要。尽管各种龋病诊断方法具有良好的诊断性能,但它们在检测近端龋损时的敏感性各不相同。本研究的目的是在体内比较DIAGNOdent和咬合翼片X线摄影术检测乳牙近端龋的准确性。

材料与方法

纳入101颗3至10岁儿童的上颌和下颌第一乳磨牙,这些牙齿无明显龋洞。首先对牙齿进行DIAGNOdent检查,然后进行咬合翼片X线摄影。计算两种检查系统的特异性和敏感性。

结果

在牙本质龋(D3)水平,DIAGNOdent和咬合翼片X线摄影术的敏感性为78.5%;在釉质龋(D1和D2)水平,敏感性为39.12%,对于健康牙齿(D0),敏感性为76.52%。DIAGNOdent与咬合翼片X线摄影之间存在强相关性(p < 0.001)。

结论

DIAGNOdent可作为检测乳牙近端龋的一种替代诊断方法。但在每个龋病水平上,DIAGNOdent在D0和D3阈值时更准确。如何引用本文:Mepparambath R, Bhat SS, Hegde SK, Anjana G, Sunil M, Mathew S. 激光荧光与咬合翼片X线摄影术检测乳牙近端龋的比较:一项体内研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2014;7(3):163 - 167。

相似文献

7

引用本文的文献

5
Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.用于龋齿检测的荧光设备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD013811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013811.

本文引用的文献

4
Utility of radiology, laser fluorescence, and transillumination.放射学、激光荧光和透照法的效用。
Dent Clin North Am. 2005 Oct;49(4):739-52, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2005.05.010.
6
Diagnosis versus detection of caries.
Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):192-8. doi: 10.1159/000077754.
7
Dental laser identifies early stages of caries.
Dent Today. 2000 Feb;19(2):30-3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验