Suppr超能文献

噻托溴铵 HandiHaler(®)和 Respimat(®)用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病:一项汇总安全性分析。

Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis.

作者信息

Halpin David Mg, Dahl Ronald, Hallmann Christoph, Mueller Achim, Tashkin Donald

机构信息

Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon, England, UK.

Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 5;10:239-59. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S75146. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tiotropium is prescribed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and delivered via HandiHaler(®) (18 μg once daily) or Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ inhaler (5 μg once daily). The recent TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat(®) (TIOSPIR™) study demonstrated that both exhibit similar safety profiles. This analysis provides an updated comprehensive safety evaluation of tiotropium(®) using data from placebo-controlled HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) trials.

METHODS

Pooled analysis of adverse event (AE) data from tiotropium HandiHaler(®) 18 μg and Respimat(®) 5 μg randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, clinical trials in patients with COPD (treatment duration ≥4 weeks). Incidence rates, rate ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) trials, both together and separately.

RESULTS

In the 28 HandiHaler(®) and 7 Respimat(®) trials included in this analysis, 11,626 patients were treated with placebo and 12,929 with tiotropium, totaling 14,909 (12,469 with HandiHaler(®); 2,440 with Respimat(®)) patient-years of tiotropium exposure. Mean age was 65 years, and mean prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 1.16 L (41% predicted). The risk (RR [95% CI]) of AEs (0.90 [0.87, 0.93]) and of serious AEs (SAEs) (0.94 [0.89, 0.99]) was significantly lower in the tiotropium than in the placebo group (HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) pooled results), and there was a numerically lower risk of fatal AEs (FAEs) (0.90 [0.79, 1.01]). The risk of cardiac AEs (0.93 [0.85, 1.02]) was numerically lower in the tiotropium group. Incidences of typical anticholinergic AEs, but not SAEs, were higher with tiotropium. Analyzed separately by inhaler, the risks of AE and SAE in the tiotropium groups remained lower than in placebo and similarly for FAEs.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that tiotropium is associated with lower rates of AEs, SAEs, and similar rates of FAEs than placebo when delivered via HandiHaler(®) or Respimat(®) (overall and separately) in patients with COPD.

摘要

引言

噻托溴铵被用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),通过HandiHaler®(每日一次,18μg)或Respimat®软雾吸入器(每日一次,5μg)给药。最近的噻托溴铵在Respimat®中的安全性和性能研究(TIOSPIR™)表明,两者具有相似的安全性。本分析使用来自安慰剂对照的HandiHaler®和Respimat®试验的数据,对噻托溴铵进行了更新的全面安全性评估。

方法

对COPD患者中噻托溴铵HandiHaler® 18μg和Respimat® 5μg随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照临床试验的不良事件(AE)数据进行汇总分析(治疗持续时间≥4周)。分别确定HandiHaler®和Respimat®试验中AE的发生率、率比(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs),以及将两者合并后的结果。

结果

本分析纳入的28项HandiHaler®试验和7项Respimat®试验中,11,626例患者接受安慰剂治疗,12,929例接受噻托溴铵治疗,噻托溴铵的暴露患者年数总计14,909(12,469例使用HandiHaler®;2,440例使用Respimat®)。平均年龄为65岁,支气管扩张剂使用前1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)平均为1.16L(预测值的41%)。与安慰剂组相比(HandiHaler®和Respimat®合并结果),噻托溴铵组AE(0.90 [0.87, 0.93])和严重AE(SAE)(0.94 [0.89, 0.99])的风险显著更低,致命AE(FAE)的风险在数值上也更低(0.90 [0.79, 1.01])。噻托溴铵组心脏AE的风险在数值上更低(0.93 [0.85, 1.02])。噻托溴铵组典型抗胆碱能AE的发生率更高,但SAE并非如此。按吸入器分别分析,噻托溴铵组AE和SAE的风险仍低于安慰剂组,FAE情况类似。

结论

本分析表明在COPD患者中,通过HandiHaler®或Respimat®给药时(总体和分别分析),与安慰剂相比,噻托溴铵的AE、SAE发生率更低,FAE发生率相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c92/4332287/08a0f7204958/copd-10-239Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验