• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者从噻托溴铵 HandiHaler 转换为 Respimat 吸入器的调查问卷:转换后即刻及数年后使用便利性和偏好的变化

Questionnaire on switching from the tiotropium HandiHaler to the Respimat inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: changes in handling and preferences immediately and several years after the switch.

作者信息

Hanada Soichiro, Wada Shota, Ohno Takeshi, Sawaguchi Hirochiyo, Muraki Masato, Tohda Yuji

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Nara Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Ikoma, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jan 6;10:69-77. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S73521. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S73521
PMID:25609941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4293296/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tiotropium (Spiriva) is an inhaled muscarinic antagonist for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is available in two forms: the HandiHaler and the Respimat inhaler. The aim of this study was to investigate the handling of and preference for each device immediately after switching from the HandiHaler to the Respimat and 2-3 years after the switch.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised two surveys. A questionnaire was first administered to 57 patients with COPD (male:female 52:5, mean age 73.6±7.1 years) 8 weeks after switching from the HandiHaler (18 μg) to the Respimat (5 μg). A second similar but simplified questionnaire was administered to 39 of these patients who continued to use the Respimat and were available for follow-up after more than 2 years. Pulmonary function was also measured during each period.

RESULTS

In the first survey, 17.5% of patients preferred the HandiHaler, and 45.6% preferred the Respimat. There were no significant changes in pulmonary function or in the incidence of adverse events after the switch. In the second survey, performed 2-3 years later, the self-assessed handling of the Respimat had significantly improved, and the number of patients who preferred the Respimat had increased to 79.5%.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of the Respimat was similar to that of the HandiHaler. This was clear immediately after the switch, even in elderly patients with COPD who were long-term users of the HandiHaler. The preference for the Respimat increased with continued use.

摘要

背景

噻托溴铵(思力华)是一种用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的吸入性毒蕈碱拮抗剂,有两种剂型:HandiHaler和Respimat吸入器。本研究的目的是调查从HandiHaler转换至Respimat后即刻以及转换2至3年后患者对每种装置的操作情况及偏好。

材料与方法

本研究包括两项调查。首先,在57例COPD患者(男∶女为52∶5,平均年龄73.6±7.1岁)从HandiHaler(18μg)转换至Respimat(5μg)8周后进行问卷调查。第二项类似但简化的问卷针对其中39例继续使用Respimat且在2年多后可进行随访的患者。在每个阶段还测量了肺功能。

结果

在首次调查中,17.5%的患者更喜欢HandiHaler,45.6%的患者更喜欢Respimat。转换后肺功能或不良事件发生率无显著变化。在2至3年后进行的第二次调查中,患者对Respimat的自我评估操作情况有显著改善,更喜欢Respimat的患者比例增至79.5%。

结论

Respimat的疗效与HandiHaler相似。即使在长期使用HandiHaler的老年COPD患者中,转换后即刻也是如此。随着持续使用,对Respimat的偏好增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/f7744649ea93/copd-10-069Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/b9ccbc9a42bc/copd-10-069Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/a0ed7697125b/copd-10-069Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/41b27ebc38e9/copd-10-069Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/6ab5023cafdf/copd-10-069Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/b26afd4b521b/copd-10-069Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/f7744649ea93/copd-10-069Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/b9ccbc9a42bc/copd-10-069Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/a0ed7697125b/copd-10-069Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/41b27ebc38e9/copd-10-069Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/6ab5023cafdf/copd-10-069Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/b26afd4b521b/copd-10-069Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/788d/4293296/f7744649ea93/copd-10-069Fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Questionnaire on switching from the tiotropium HandiHaler to the Respimat inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: changes in handling and preferences immediately and several years after the switch.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者从噻托溴铵 HandiHaler 转换为 Respimat 吸入器的调查问卷:转换后即刻及数年后使用便利性和偏好的变化
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jan 6;10:69-77. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S73521. eCollection 2015.
2
Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis.噻托溴铵 HandiHaler(®)和 Respimat(®)用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病:一项汇总安全性分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 5;10:239-59. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S75146. eCollection 2015.
3
Efficacy and safety of combining olodaterol Respimat(®) and tiotropium HandiHaler(®) in patients with COPD: results of two randomized, double-blind, active-controlled studies.奥达特罗Respimat(®)与噻托溴铵HandiHaler(®)联合用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性:两项随机、双盲、活性对照研究的结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Oct 14;9:1133-44. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S72482. eCollection 2014.
4
Effect of switching tiotropium HandiHaler® to Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler in patients with COPD: the difference of adverse events and usability between inhaler devices.在 COPD 患者中,从噻托溴铵 HandiHaler®切换至 Respimat® Soft Mist™吸入器的效果:两种吸入装置不良事件和可用性的差异。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013 Feb;26(1):41-5. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0941. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
5
The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes.噻托溴铵在Respimat®(思力华®)中的安全性和性能试验:肺量计测定结果
Respir Res. 2015 Sep 15;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4.
6
Tiotropium Respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD.噻托溴铵 Respimat 吸入器与 COPD 患者的死亡风险。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1491-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303342. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
7
Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials.噻托溴铵软雾吸入剂(Respimat®)与都保(HandiHaler®):不同剂量支气管扩张剂在临床试验中的疗效比较
Adv Ther. 2016 May;33(5):786-93. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0322-9. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
The efficacy of tiotropium administered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler or HandiHaler in COPD patients.通过Respimat软雾吸入器或HandiHaler吸入噻托溴铵在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的疗效。
Respir Med. 2009 Jan;103(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
9
Lack of paradoxical bronchoconstriction after administration of tiotropium via Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler in COPD.噻托溴铵通过 Respimat® Soft Mist™ 吸入器在 COPD 中的应用不存在矛盾性支气管收缩。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:245-51. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S16094. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
10
A systematic review of comparative studies of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does inhaler choice matter?噻托溴铵软雾吸入剂(Respimat®)与噻托溴铵干粉吸入器(HandiHaler®)用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较研究的系统评价:吸入器的选择重要吗?
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Oct 11;16(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0291-4.

引用本文的文献

1
An Observational Study Assessing Changes in Health and Functional Status in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) During Therapy with Spiolto Respimat in Everyday Clinical Practice: The Greek ELLACTO Study.一项在日常临床实践中评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者使用思力华能倍乐治疗期间健康和功能状态变化的观察性研究:希腊ELLACTO研究
Pulm Ther. 2021 Dec;7(2):429-443. doi: 10.1007/s41030-021-00156-7. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Technical Evaluation of Soft Mist Inhaler Use in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.软雾吸入器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的使用技术评估:一项横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 22;15:1471-1479. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S253338. eCollection 2020.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Risks associated with tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: overview of the evidence to date.噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的风险:现有证据概述。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Jun;3(3):123-31. doi: 10.1177/2042098612438388.
2
Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD--an assessment of inhaler technique and patient preferences.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的吸入装置——吸入技术及患者偏好评估
Respir Med. 2014 Jul;108(7):968-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 10.
3
Considerations for managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly.
Inhaler device feature preferences among patients with obstructive lung diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阻塞性肺疾病患者对吸入装置特性的偏好:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020718.
4
The Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler: Implications of Drug Delivery Characteristics for Patients.瑞普米特软雾吸入器:药物输送特性对患者的影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Nov;39(11):1021-1030. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00835-z.
5
Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via Discair versus HandiHaler in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV trial.对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者,通过Diskair与HandiHaler每日一次吸入18μg噻托溴铵的支气管扩张疗效:随机、活性药物对照、平行组、开放标签的IV期试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 22;11:2859-2867. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S119114. eCollection 2016.
6
A systematic review of comparative studies of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does inhaler choice matter?噻托溴铵软雾吸入剂(Respimat®)与噻托溴铵干粉吸入器(HandiHaler®)用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较研究的系统评价:吸入器的选择重要吗?
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Oct 11;16(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0291-4.
7
Patients' perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®).患者在吸入器选择方面的观点和偏好:Respimat(®)或HandiHaler(®)的案例
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Aug 18;10:1561-72. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S82857. eCollection 2016.
8
The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients.通过使用三种吸入装置的处理问卷评估教育训练对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的经济影响。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 May 10;8:171-6. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S104066. eCollection 2016.
9
Impact of tiotropium + olodaterol on physical functioning in COPD: results of an open-label observational study.噻托溴铵+奥达特罗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体功能的影响:一项开放标签观察性研究的结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Apr 27;11:891-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S103023. eCollection 2016.
10
Acceptability and preference of three inhalation devices assessed by the Handling Questionnaire in asthma and COPD patients.通过操作问卷评估哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对三种吸入装置的可接受性和偏好。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2016 Feb 10;11:7. doi: 10.1186/s40248-016-0044-5. eCollection 2015.
老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病的管理考量
Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:23-30. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S52999. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
4
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tiotropium solution and tiotropium powder in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵溶液和噻托溴铵粉雾剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的药代动力学和药效学
J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;54(4):405-14. doi: 10.1002/jcph.215. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
5
Tiotropium Respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD.噻托溴铵 Respimat 吸入器与 COPD 患者的死亡风险。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1491-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303342. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
6
Adherence to inhaled therapies, health outcomes and costs in patients with asthma and COPD.哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入疗法的依从性、健康结局和成本。
Respir Med. 2013 Oct;107(10):1481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 3.
7
Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD009285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009285.pub2.
8
Effect of switching tiotropium HandiHaler® to Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler in patients with COPD: the difference of adverse events and usability between inhaler devices.在 COPD 患者中,从噻托溴铵 HandiHaler®切换至 Respimat® Soft Mist™吸入器的效果:两种吸入装置不良事件和可用性的差异。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013 Feb;26(1):41-5. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0941. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
9
Efficacy of tiotropium in COPD patients with FEV1 ≥ 60% participating in the UPLIFT® trial.噻托溴铵在 UPLIFT®试验中 FEV1≥60%的 COPD 患者中的疗效。
COPD. 2012 Jun;9(3):289-96. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2012.656211. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
10
Inhaler device selection: special considerations in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入器装置的选择:老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的特殊考虑因素。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Jul 1;68(13):1221-32. doi: 10.2146/ajhp100452.