Davies John R, Chang Yu-mei, Bishop D Timothy, Armstrong Bruce K, Bataille Veronique, Bergman Wilma, Berwick Marianne, Bracci Paige M, Elwood J Mark, Ernstoff Marc S, Green Adele, Gruis Nelleke A, Holly Elizabeth A, Ingvar Christian, Kanetsky Peter A, Karagas Margaret R, Lee Tim K, Le Marchand Loïc, Mackie Rona M, Olsson Håkan, Østerlind Anne, Rebbeck Timothy R, Reich Kristian, Sasieni Peter, Siskind Victor, Swerdlow Anthony J, Titus Linda, Zens Michael S, Ziegler Andreas, Gallagher Richard P, Barrett Jennifer H, Newton-Bishop Julia
Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sax Institute and Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 May;24(5):817-24. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1062. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
We report the development of a cutaneous melanoma risk algorithm based upon seven factors; hair color, skin type, family history, freckling, nevus count, number of large nevi, and history of sunburn, intended to form the basis of a self-assessment Web tool for the general public.
Predicted odds of melanoma were estimated by analyzing a pooled dataset from 16 case-control studies using logistic random coefficients models. Risk categories were defined based on the distribution of the predicted odds in the controls from these studies. Imputation was used to estimate missing data in the pooled datasets. The 30th, 60th, and 90th centiles were used to distribute individuals into four risk groups for their age, sex, and geographic location. Cross-validation was used to test the robustness of the thresholds for each group by leaving out each study one by one. Performance of the model was assessed in an independent UK case-control study dataset.
Cross-validation confirmed the robustness of the threshold estimates. Cases and controls were well discriminated in the independent dataset [area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.78]. Twenty-nine percent of cases were in the highest risk group compared with 7% of controls, and 43% of controls were in the lowest risk group compared with 13% of cases.
We have identified a composite score representing an estimate of relative risk and successfully validated this score in an independent dataset.
This score may be a useful tool to inform members of the public about their melanoma risk.
我们报告了一种基于七个因素(头发颜色、皮肤类型、家族病史、雀斑、痣的数量、大痣的数量和晒伤史)开发的皮肤黑色素瘤风险算法,旨在为公众形成一个自我评估网络工具的基础。
通过使用逻辑随机系数模型分析来自16项病例对照研究的汇总数据集,估计黑色素瘤的预测几率。根据这些研究中对照组预测几率的分布定义风险类别。使用插补法估计汇总数据集中的缺失数据。使用第30、60和90百分位数,根据年龄、性别和地理位置将个体分为四个风险组。通过逐一排除每项研究来进行交叉验证,以测试每组阈值的稳健性。在一个独立的英国病例对照研究数据集中评估模型的性能。
交叉验证证实了阈值估计的稳健性。在独立数据集中,病例和对照得到了很好的区分[曲线下面积,0.75;95%置信区间(CI),0.73 - 0.78]。29%的病例处于最高风险组,而对照组为7%;43%的对照组处于最低风险组,而病例组为13%。
我们确定了一个代表相对风险估计值的综合评分,并在一个独立数据集中成功验证了该评分。
该评分可能是一个有用的工具,可让公众了解自己患黑色素瘤的风险。