• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子生物学顶点评估:针对高年级分子生物学学生的概念评估。

The molecular biology capstone assessment: a concept assessment for upper-division molecular biology students.

作者信息

Couch Brian A, Wood William B, Knight Jennifer K

机构信息

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):ar10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-04-0071.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.14-04-0071
PMID:25713098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4353076/
Abstract

Measuring students' conceptual understandings has become increasingly important to biology faculty members involved in evaluating and improving departmental programs. We developed the Molecular Biology Capstone Assessment (MBCA) to gauge comprehension of fundamental concepts in molecular and cell biology and the ability to apply these concepts in novel scenarios. Targeted at graduating students, the MBCA consists of 18 multiple-true/false (T/F) questions. Each question consists of a narrative stem followed by four T/F statements, which allows a more detailed assessment of student understanding than the traditional multiple-choice format. Questions were iteratively developed with extensive faculty and student feedback, including validation through faculty reviews and response validation through student interviews. The final assessment was taken online by 504 students in upper-division courses at seven institutions. Data from this administration indicate that the MBCA has acceptable levels of internal reliability (α=0.80) and test-retest stability (r=0.93). Students achieved a wide range of scores with a 67% overall average. Performance results suggest that students have an incomplete understanding of many molecular biology concepts and continue to hold incorrect conceptions previously documented among introductory-level students. By pinpointing areas of conceptual difficulty, the MBCA can provide faculty members with guidance for improving undergraduate biology programs.

摘要

对于参与评估和改进院系课程的生物学教师而言,衡量学生的概念理解能力变得越来越重要。我们开发了分子生物学顶点评估(MBCA),以评估学生对分子和细胞生物学基本概念的理解,以及在新情境中应用这些概念的能力。MBCA针对即将毕业的学生,由18道多项正误判断题组成。每道题由一段叙述题干和四个正误陈述组成,与传统的多项选择题形式相比,这种形式能够更详细地评估学生的理解情况。我们通过广泛收集教师和学生的反馈,对题目进行了反复修改,包括通过教师评审进行验证以及通过学生访谈进行回答验证。最终,来自七所院校的504名高年级学生在线完成了这项评估。此次评估的数据表明,MBCA具有可接受的内部信度水平(α=0.80)和重测稳定性(r=0.93)。学生们的成绩分布广泛,总体平均分为67%。成绩结果表明,学生们对许多分子生物学概念的理解并不完整,并且仍然持有一些之前在入门级学生中记录过的错误概念。通过确定概念难点领域,MBCA可以为教师改进本科生物学课程提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/f96ab8b1d421/ar10fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/4370ca6a3b9d/ar10fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/86b7eff0bd38/ar10fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/c7198059ea8d/ar10fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/a4e6f85cf975/ar10fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/f96ab8b1d421/ar10fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/4370ca6a3b9d/ar10fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/86b7eff0bd38/ar10fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/c7198059ea8d/ar10fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/a4e6f85cf975/ar10fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d40/4353076/f96ab8b1d421/ar10fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
The molecular biology capstone assessment: a concept assessment for upper-division molecular biology students.分子生物学顶点评估:针对高年级分子生物学学生的概念评估。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):ar10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-04-0071.
2
A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology.入门分子与细胞生物学的诊断评估。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):453-61. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-04-0055.
3
A Biology Core Concept Instrument (BCCI) to Teach and Assess Student Conceptual Understanding.生物学核心概念工具(BCCI)用于教授和评估学生的概念理解。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):ar46. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-09-0192.
4
A national comparison of biochemistry and molecular biology capstone experiences.生物化学与分子生物学顶点体验的全国性比较。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;43(4):223-32. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20869. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
6
Development of the Central Dogma Concept Inventory (CDCI) Assessment Tool.中心法则概念量表(CDCI)评估工具的开发。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Summer;15(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-06-0124.
7
What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.他们在想什么?关于基础生物学中酸碱化学的学生写作的自动化分析。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):283-93. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0084.
8
The genetic drift inventory: a tool for measuring what advanced undergraduates have mastered about genetic drift.遗传漂变清单:一种衡量大学生对遗传漂变掌握程度的工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Spring;13(1):65-75. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0159.
9
Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes.超越中心法则:基于模型的基因如何决定表型的学习。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Spring;15(1):ar4. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-04-0105.
10
Introductory biology undergraduate students' mixed ideas about genetic information flow.生物学导论专业本科生对遗传信息流的混合理解。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 May;49(3):372-382. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21483. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Biology exams rarely use visual models to engage higher-order cognitive skills.生物学考试很少使用视觉模型来激发高阶认知技能。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0317077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317077. eCollection 2025.
2
Unpacking and Utilizing Neuroscience Core Concepts.剖析与运用神经科学核心概念。
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2024 Jul 21;22(2):E22-E27. doi: 10.59390/IFWT3187. eCollection 2024 Winter.
3
Missed connections: Exploring features of undergraduate biology students' knowledge networks relating gene regulation, cell-cell communication, and phenotypic expression.

本文引用的文献

1
BioCore Guide: A Tool for Interpreting the Core Concepts of Vision and Change for Biology Majors.生物核心指南:为生物学专业学生解读《愿景与变革》核心概念的工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Summer;13(2):200-11. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0233.
2
The genetic drift inventory: a tool for measuring what advanced undergraduates have mastered about genetic drift.遗传漂变清单:一种衡量大学生对遗传漂变掌握程度的工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Spring;13(1):65-75. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0159.
3
What's Downstream? A Set of Classroom Exercises to Help Students Understand Recessive Epistasis.
错失的联系:探索与基因调控、细胞间通讯和表型表达相关的大学生物学学生知识网络的特征。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar44. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0041.
4
Comparing study features is easy but identifying next steps is hard: Evaluating critical thinking through the Biology Lab Inventory of Critical Thinking in Ecology.比较研究特征很容易,但确定后续步骤却很难:通过生态学批判性思维生物学实验室清单评估批判性思维。
Ecol Evol. 2023 May 10;13(5):e10071. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10071. eCollection 2023 May.
5
How Administration Stakes and Settings Affect Student Behavior and Performance on a Biology Concept Assessment.管理策略和环境如何影响学生在生物学概念评估中的行为和表现。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Jun;22(2):ar27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-09-0181.
6
Community-Derived Core Concepts for Neuroscience Higher Education.社区主导的神经科学高等教育核心概念。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Jun;22(2):ar18. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-02-0018.
7
Understanding Randomness on a Molecular Level: A Diagnostic Tool.理解分子水平上的随机性:一种诊断工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Jun;22(2):ar17. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-05-0097.
8
Revisiting Clickers: In-Class Questions Followed by At-Home Reflections Are Associated with Higher Student Performance on Related Exam Questions.重新审视课堂应答器:课堂提问后进行课后反思与学生在相关考试问题上的更高表现相关。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Jul 6;23(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00038-22. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Teaching meiosis with the DNA triangle framework: A classroom activity that changes how students think about chromosomes.运用 DNA 三角框架教学减数分裂:改变学生染色体思维方式的课堂活动。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2022 Jan;50(1):44-54. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21583. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
10
GenBio-MAPS as a Case Study to Understand and Address the Effects of Test-Taking Motivation in Low-Stakes Program Assessments.GenBio-MAPS 作为一个案例研究,以了解和解决低风险项目评估中考试动机的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-10-0243.
下游是什么?一组帮助学生理解隐性上位性的课堂练习。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2013 Dec 2;14(2):197-205. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v14i2.560. eCollection 2013.
4
Development of a meiosis concept inventory.减数分裂概念量表的开发。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):655-64. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-10-0174.
5
Assessing student understanding of host pathogen interactions using a concept inventory.使用概念量表评估学生对宿主-病原体相互作用的理解。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2009 Dec 17;10(1):43-50. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v10.98. Print 2009.
6
Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments.发展科学素养技能测试(TOSLS):测量大学生对科学信息和论点的评价。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):364-77. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
7
Turning randomness into meaning at the molecular level using Muller's morphs.利用 Muller 的形态变化在分子水平上将随机性转化为意义。
Biol Open. 2012 Apr 15;1(4):405-10. doi: 10.1242/bio.2012031. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
8
Using the Genetics Concept Assessment to document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses.运用遗传学概念评估来记录本科遗传学课程中持续存在的概念性困难。
Genetics. 2012 May;191(1):21-32. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.137810. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
9
The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for use in Biology.科罗拉多州科学学习态度调查(CLASS)在生物学中的应用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Fall;10(3):268-78. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-10-0133.
10
A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology.入门分子与细胞生物学的诊断评估。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):453-61. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-04-0055.