Suppr超能文献

中风后急性后期服务使用及常规出院回家的当代趋势与预测因素

Contemporary trends and predictors of postacute service use and routine discharge home after stroke.

作者信息

Prvu Bettger Janet, McCoy Lisa, Smith Eric E, Fonarow Gregg C, Schwamm Lee H, Peterson Eric D

机构信息

Duke University School of Nursing, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.P.B., L.M.C., E.D.P.).

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta,, Canada (E.E.S.).

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Feb 23;4(2):e001038. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001038.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Returning home after the hospital is a primary aim for healthcare; however, additional postacute care (PAC) services are sometimes necessary for returning stroke patients to their pre-event status. Recent trends in hospital discharge disposition specifying PAC use have not been examined across age groups or health insurance types.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined trends in discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), home with home health (HH), and home without services for 849 780 patients ≥18 years of age with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at 1687 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with discharge to any PAC (IRF, SNF, or HH) versus discharge home without services. From 2003 to 2011, there was a 2.1% increase (unadjusted P=0.001) in PAC use after a stroke hospitalization. Change was greatest in SNF use, an 8.3% decrease over the period. IRF and HH increased 6.9% and 3.6%, respectively. The 2 strongest clinical predictors of PAC use after acute care were patients not ambulating on the second day of their hospital stay (ambulation odds ratio [OR], 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.86 to 3.23) and those who failed a dysphagia screen or had an order restricting oral intake (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 2.37 to 2.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Four in 10 stroke patients are discharged home without services. Although little has changed overall in PAC use since 2003, further research is needed to explain the shift in service use by type and its effect on outcomes.

摘要

背景

出院后回家是医疗保健的主要目标;然而,对于中风康复患者来说,有时需要额外的急性后期护理(PAC)服务才能恢复到发病前的状态。目前尚未对不同年龄组或健康保险类型中指定使用PAC的医院出院处置的近期趋势进行研究。

方法与结果

我们研究了参与“遵循卒中指南”项目的1687家医院中849780名年龄≥18岁的缺血性或出血性中风患者出院到 inpatient rehabilitation facilities(IRF)、skilled nursing facilities(SNF)、有家庭健康护理(HH)的家庭以及无服务的家庭的趋势。多变量分析用于确定与出院到任何PAC(IRF、SNF或HH)相比出院回家且无服务相关的因素。从2003年到2011年,中风住院后PAC的使用增加了2.1%(未调整P = 0.001)。变化最大的是SNF的使用,在此期间下降了8.3%。IRF和HH分别增加了6.9%和3.6%。急性护理后PAC使用的两个最强临床预测因素是住院第二天不能行走的患者(行走比值比[OR],3.03;95%置信区间[CI],2.86至3.23)以及吞咽困难筛查未通过或有医嘱限制经口摄入的患者(OR,2.48;95%CI,2.37至2.59)。

结论

十分之四的中风患者出院回家时没有接受服务。尽管自2003年以来PAC的总体使用变化不大,但仍需要进一步研究来解释服务使用类型的转变及其对结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3174/4345857/9a95ab604c89/jah3-4-e001038-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验