Nguyen Vu Q C, PrvuBettger Janet, Guerrier Tami, Hirsch Mark A, Thomas J George, Pugh Terrence M, Rhoads Charles F
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;96(7):1297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation.
Retrospective cohort study.
Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities.
Adult patients with stroke (N=2085).
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96-.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48-.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55-.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71-.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77-.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions.
One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.
研究急性住院康复后与出院回家相比,独立与转至专业护理机构(SNF)出院相关的社会人口学和临床特征。
回顾性队列研究。
三家经三级认证的急性护理康复机构。
成年中风患者(N = 2085)。
不适用。
不适用。
在4年期间于3个中心接受治疗的2085例中风患者中,78.2%(n = 1631)出院回家,21.8%(n = 454)转至SNF出院。多变量逻辑回归分析结果表明,如果患者年龄较大(优势比[OR],0.98;95%置信区间[CI],0.96 - 0.99)、分居或离婚(与已婚相比;OR,0.61;95% CI,0.48 - 0.79)、拥有医疗保险(与私人保险相比;OR,0.69;95% CI,0.55 - 0.88)、有吞咽困难(OR,0.83;95% CI,0.71 - 0.98)或认知缺陷(OR,0.79;95% CI,0.77 - 0.81),则出院回家的可能性较小。运动FIM评分较高入院的患者出院回家的几率较高(OR,1.10;95% CI,1.09 - 1.11)。以下因素与出院处置无关:性别、种族、中风前职业状况、二级医疗保险的可获得性、从中风发作到康复机构入院的天数、中风类型、损伤组、入院时的认知FIM、其他中风缺陷(失语、共济失调、忽视或言语障碍)、低钠血症或尿路感染的中风并发症或合并症。
五分之一的中风患者在住院康复后转至SNF出院。入院时,确定了几个社会人口学和临床特征,可将其视为出院计划早期讨论中的重要因素。