Ustun Yakup, Aslan Tugrul, Sagsen Burak, Kesim Bertan
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye.
Eur J Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):41-46. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.149638.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of dentinal microcracks caused by different preparation techniques.
120 extracted human mandibular incisor teeth were divided into five experimental groups and one control group (n = 20): Group 1: Hand preparation with balanced force technique up to #25 K-file. Group 2: Preparation with only ProTaper F2 instrument in a reciprocating movement. Group 3: Preparation with Reciproc R25 instrument in a reciprocating movement. Group 4: Preparation with ProTaper instruments up to F2 instrument. Group 5: Preparation with ProTaper Next instruments up to X2 instrument. No procedure was applied to control group. The roots were sectioned horizontally at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex and examined. Absence or presence of dentinal microcracks was noted.
The Chi-square test was performed to compare the appearance of cracked roots between all groups. There were no significant differences among the groups (P > 0.05).
In conclusion, except the hand file and control group, all experimental groups showed microcrack formations.
本研究旨在调查不同预备技术导致牙本质微裂纹的发生率。
120颗拔除的人下颌切牙被分为五个试验组和一个对照组(n = 20):第1组:使用平衡力技术用#25 K锉手动预备。第2组:仅使用ProTaper F2器械以往复运动方式预备。第3组:使用Reciproc R25器械以往复运动方式预备。第4组:使用ProTaper器械预备至F2器械。第5组:使用ProTaper Next器械预备至X2器械。对照组不进行任何操作。将牙根从根尖水平切成3、6和9毫米,并进行检查。记录牙本质微裂纹的有无。
进行卡方检验以比较所有组之间牙根裂纹的出现情况。各组之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
总之,除了手动锉组和对照组外,所有试验组均出现了微裂纹形成。