Azari Mansour R, Yazdian Asil, Zendehdel Rezvan, Souri Hamid, Khodakarim Soheila, Peirovi Habibalalah, Panahi Davod, Kazempour Marzieh
Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Department of Occupational Hygiene, College of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Occupational Hygiene, College of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tanaffos. 2014;13(3):38-45.
In recent years, some studies have tried to improve Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) for counting asbestos fibers. Due to the lack of a universally accepted alternative method, this study aimed to improve PCM for better counting of asbestos fibers.
Confirmed asbestos standards were applied using a dust generator for sampling. Sampling from the dust generator was carried out according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ID-160 method and 95 samples with diverse densities were prepared to be counted using conventional and modern PCM. All samples were counted single blindly by a co-author of this study and the obtained data were analyzed by paired t-test, correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Duplicate samples were prepared for qualitative analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X ray.
Asbestos densities on filters were in the range of less than 100 to 600 fibers/mm(2). Statistically, significant differences were observed for the count density of the 95 samples counted by the two phase contrast microscopes (P<0.001). Nikon microscope demonstrated higher counts compared to conventional microscope and had a lower coefficient of variation. Samples were analyzed qualitatively using FT-IR and SEM, and the presence of asbestos fibers was confirmed.
The improved PCM and FT-IR methods presented in this study demonstrated more precise and accurate determination of personal exposure to airborne asbestos fibers and subsequent risk assessment.
近年来,一些研究试图改进相差显微镜(PCM)以对石棉纤维进行计数。由于缺乏普遍接受的替代方法,本研究旨在改进PCM以便更好地计数石棉纤维。
使用粉尘发生器应用已确认的石棉标准进行采样。根据美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)ID - 160方法从粉尘发生器进行采样,并制备95个具有不同密度的样品,使用传统和现代PCM进行计数。所有样品由本研究的一位共同作者单盲计数,所得数据通过配对t检验、相关系数和布兰德 - 奥特曼分析进行分析。制备重复样品用于通过傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT - IR)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和X射线进行定性分析。
滤膜上的石棉密度范围为每平方毫米少于100至600根纤维。在统计学上,观察到两种相差显微镜对95个样品计数的密度存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。尼康显微镜与传统显微镜相比计数更高,且变异系数更低。使用FT - IR和SEM对样品进行定性分析,并确认了石棉纤维的存在。
本研究中提出的改进PCM和FT - IR方法在确定个人对空气中石棉纤维的暴露及后续风险评估方面表现出更精确和准确的结果。