Division of sport Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, School of Sport Tourism and Outdoors, University of Central Lancashire.
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Dec 30;44:5-17. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0106. eCollection 2014 Dec 9.
Identification of the hip joint centre (HJC) is important in the biomechanical examination of human movement. However, there is yet to be any published information regarding the influence of different HJC locations on hip and knee joint kinetics during functional tasks. This study aimed to examine the influence of four different HJC techniques on 3-D hip and knee joint kinetics/kinematics during the squat. Hip and knee joint kinetics/kinematics of the squat were obtained from fifteen male participants using an eight camera motion capture system. The 3-D kinetics/kinematics of the squat were quantified using four hip joint centre estimation techniques. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare the discrete parameters as a function of each HJC location. The results show that significant differences in joint angles and moment parameters were evident at both the hip and knee joint in the coronal and transverse planes. These observations indicate that when calculating non-sagittal joint kinetics/kinematics during the squat, researchers should carefully consider their HJC method as it may significantly affect the interpretation of their data.
髋关节中心(HJC)的确定在人体运动的生物力学检查中很重要。然而,目前还没有关于不同 HJC 位置对功能任务中髋关节和膝关节动力学的影响的任何已发表信息。本研究旨在探讨在深蹲过程中,四种不同的 HJC 技术对 3-D 髋关节和膝关节动力学/运动学的影响。使用八相机运动捕捉系统从十五名男性参与者中获得了深蹲的髋关节和膝关节动力学/运动学。使用四种髋关节中心估计技术对深蹲的 3-D 动力学/运动学进行了量化。使用重复测量 ANOVA 比较了作为每个 HJC 位置函数的离散参数。结果表明,在冠状面和横断面上,髋关节和膝关节的关节角度和力矩参数存在明显差异。这些观察结果表明,在计算深蹲过程中的非矢状面关节动力学/运动学时,研究人员应仔细考虑他们的 HJC 方法,因为它可能会显著影响他们数据的解释。