• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pathways to colonoscopy in the South: seeds of health disparities.南方地区结肠镜检查的途径:健康差距的根源
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):e103-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302347. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
2
Factors affecting compliance with colorectal cancer screening among households residing in the largely Haitian community of Little Haiti, Miami-Dade County, Florida: an observational study.佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县小海地主要为海地裔社区居民家庭中影响结直肠癌筛查依从性的因素:一项观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e806. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000806.
3
Racial/Ethnic Minorities Ineligible for Direct Access Colonoscopy (DAC): Identifying Patients Who Fall Through the Cracks.不符合直接接入结肠镜检查(DAC)条件的少数民族:确定那些漏掉的患者。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015 Mar;2(1):86-92. doi: 10.1007/s40615-014-0051-1. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
4
A randomized controlled trial using patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income minorities.一项使用患者导航来提高低收入少数族裔结肠镜检查筛查率的随机对照试验。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Mar;100(3):278-84. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31240-2.
5
Association of local capacity for endoscopy with individual use of colorectal cancer screening and stage at diagnosis.内镜诊疗当地资源与结直肠癌筛查和诊断分期个体应用的相关性。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 15;116(12):2922-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25093.
6
Determinants of variations in self-reported barriers to colonoscopy among uninsured patients in a primary care setting.初级保健机构中未参保患者自我报告的结肠镜检查障碍的变化决定因素。
J Community Health. 2015 Apr;40(2):260-70. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9925-8.
7
Increasing referral rate for screening colonoscopy through patient education and activation at a primary care clinic in New York City.通过纽约市一家初级保健诊所的患者教育与动员提高结肠镜筛查转诊率。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Aug;99(8):1427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
9
Racial Disparities and Factors Affecting Michigan Colorectal Cancer Screening.种族差异与影响密歇根州结直肠癌筛查的因素。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Aug;5(4):901-906. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0438-x. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Colorectal neoplasia detection among black and Latino individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy: a prospective cohort study.在接受筛查结肠镜检查的黑人和拉丁裔个体中检测结直肠肿瘤:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):466-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.12.020.

引用本文的文献

1
A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.黑人男性结直肠癌筛查决定因素的社会生态分类:一项混合方法系统评价的见解
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Dec 25;49:102954. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Colonic Polyps: Diagnosis and Surveillance.结肠息肉:诊断与监测
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Dec;29(4):296-305. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584091.
3
Providers' Perceptions of Barriers to Optimal Communication With Patients During the Postcolonoscopy Experience.结肠镜检查后医护人员对与患者进行最佳沟通的障碍的认知。
J Patient Exp. 2018 Dec;5(4):272-278. doi: 10.1177/2374373518759548. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
Colorectal cancer screening in African Americans: practice patterns in the United States. Are we doing enough?美国非裔人群的结直肠癌筛查:实践模式。我们做得够吗?
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016 May;4(2):136-40. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gow005. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Adjuvant chemotherapy for t1 node-positive colon cancers provides significant survival benefit.T1期淋巴结阳性结肠癌的辅助化疗可带来显著的生存获益。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Dec;57(12):1341-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000245.
2
The effect of primary care physician counseling on participation rate and use of sedation in colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening program--a randomized controlled study.初级保健医生咨询对基于结肠镜检查的结直肠癌筛查项目参与率和镇静使用的影响——一项随机对照研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):878-84. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.913191. Epub 2014 May 5.
3
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014.结直肠癌统计数据,2014 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Mar-Apr;64(2):104-17. doi: 10.3322/caac.21220. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
4
Colorectal cancer incidence and screening - United States, 2008 and 2010.2008年和2010年美国结直肠癌发病率及筛查情况
MMWR Suppl. 2013 Nov 22;62(3):53-60.
5
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use--United States, 2012.生命体征:2012 年美国结直肠癌筛查检测使用情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Nov 8;62(44):881-8.
6
Barriers and facilitators to adherence to screening colonoscopy among African-Americans: a mixed-methods analysis.非裔美国人结肠镜筛查依从性的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法分析
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Dec;28(4):722-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0510-0.
7
Patients whose physicians recommend colonoscopy and those who follow through.其医生建议进行结肠镜检查的患者以及那些接受检查的患者。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):83-94. doi: 10.1177/2150131912464887. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
8
Age-based and sex-based disparities in screening colonoscopy use among medicare beneficiaries.基于年龄和性别的医疗保险受益人群结肠镜筛查使用的差异。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;47(7):630-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31828345c8.
9
Sex-based disparities in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中的性别差异。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;37(6):555-60. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318282a830.
10
Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.城乡结直肠癌筛查差异:来自疾病控制中心行为风险因素监测研究 1998-2005 年数据的横断面分析。
Cancer Med. 2012 Dec;1(3):350-6. doi: 10.1002/cam4.40. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

南方地区结肠镜检查的途径:健康差距的根源

Pathways to colonoscopy in the South: seeds of health disparities.

作者信息

Curbow Barbara A, Dailey Amy B, King-Marshall Evelyn C, Barnett Tracy E, Schumacher Jessica R, Sultan Shahnaz, George Thomas J

机构信息

At the time of the study, Barbara A. Curbow, Evelyn C. King-Marshall, and Tracy E. Barnett were with the Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health, University of Florida, Gainesville. Jessica R. Schumacher was with the Department of Health Services Research, Management & Policy, Gainesville. Shahnaz Sultan was with the North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Gainesville. Thomas J. George Jr was with the Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville. Amy B. Dailey was with the Department of Health Sciences, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):e103-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302347. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302347
PMID:25713952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4358163/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to highlight sociodemographic differences in how patients access colonoscopy.

METHODS

We invited all eligible patients (n = 2500) from 2 academy-affiliated colonoscopy centers in Alachua County, Florida (1 free standing, 1 hospital based), to participate in a precolonoscopy survey (September 2011-October 2013); patients agreeing to participate (n = 1841, response rate = 73.6%) received a $5.00 gift card.

RESULTS

We found sociodemographic differences in referral pathway, costs, and reasons associated with obtaining the procedure. Patients with the ideal pathway (referred by their regular doctor for age-appropriate screening) were more likely to be Black (compared with other minorities), male, high income, employed, and older. Having the colonoscopy because of symptoms was associated with being female, younger, and having lower income. We found significant differences for 1 previously underestimated barrier, having a spouse to accompany the patient to the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' facilitators and barriers to colonoscopy differed by sociodemographics in our study, which implies that interventions based on a single facilitator will not be effective for all subgroups of a population.

摘要

目的

我们旨在突出患者在接受结肠镜检查方式上的社会人口统计学差异。

方法

我们邀请了佛罗里达州阿拉楚阿县2家学术附属结肠镜检查中心(1家独立中心,1家医院附属中心)的所有符合条件的患者(n = 2500)参与结肠镜检查前的调查(2011年9月至2013年10月);同意参与的患者(n = 1841,应答率 = 73.6%)可获得一张5美元的礼品卡。

结果

我们发现患者在转诊途径、费用以及接受该检查的相关原因方面存在社会人口统计学差异。具有理想转诊途径(由其常规医生因适龄筛查而转诊)的患者更可能是黑人(与其他少数族裔相比)、男性、高收入、有工作且年龄较大。因出现症状而接受结肠镜检查与女性、年轻以及低收入相关。我们发现了一个此前被低估的障碍存在显著差异,即有配偶陪同患者接受检查。

结论

在我们的研究中,患者接受结肠镜检查的促进因素和障碍因社会人口统计学特征而异,这意味着基于单一促进因素的干预措施对人群中的所有亚组并非都有效。