Crocker-Buque Tim, Pollock Allyson M
Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, London E12AD, UK
Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, London E12AD, UK.
J R Soc Med. 2015 Feb;108(2):57-67. doi: 10.1177/0141076814554671.
To critically appraise the quality of sub-Saharan African cancer registration systems that submitted data to GLOBOCAN 2008 with respect to population coverage using publicly available information and to show the use of GLOBOCAN statistics in determining global health priorities.
Sources of cancer registration data for twenty-six sub-Saharan African cancer registries were identified from GLOBOCAN 2008 factsheets. Additional information was extracted from International Agency for Research on Cancer publications. A literature search was conducted to identify studies that reported additional information on data collection methods and provided 27 studies. The websites of the 10 largest funders of development assistance for health were searched for GLOBOCAN citations.
Twenty-six sub-Saharan African cancer registration systems submitting data to GLOBOCAN 2008 in relation to 21 countries.
Information on 15 quality variables were extracted and compared with the international gold standard for cancer registration systems.
Population coverage of the cancer registries ranged from from 2.3% of the population in Kenya to 100% in The Gambia, with a heavy urban bias in all countries. However, 20 countries (300 million people) had no cancer registration systems. Nineteen of the 26 registries failed to meet more than five of the 15 quality criteria and only one country met more than 10. Seven of the 10 largest funders of development assistance for health cite GLOBOCAN statistics in support of policy priorities.
GLOBOCAN 2008 estimates are based on data drawn from poor quality cancer registration systems, with limited or no population registry coverage. It is essential the GLOBOCAN 2012 estimates should provide information on the quality of the data collection and explain the limitations of the estimates. Development organisations and the World Health Organization need to take a more cautious approach when using these data to determine priorities and allocating resources.
利用公开可得信息,严格评估向2008年全球癌症数据(GLOBOCAN 2008)提交数据的撒哈拉以南非洲癌症登记系统在人口覆盖方面的质量,并展示GLOBOCAN统计数据在确定全球卫生重点方面的应用。
从2008年全球癌症数据情况说明书中确定了26个撒哈拉以南非洲癌症登记处的癌症登记数据来源。从国际癌症研究机构的出版物中提取了其他信息。进行了文献检索,以确定报告了有关数据收集方法的其他信息的研究,并获得了27项研究。在为卫生提供发展援助的10个最大资助者的网站上搜索了GLOBOCAN的引用情况。
26个撒哈拉以南非洲癌症登记系统向2008年全球癌症数据提交了与21个国家相关的数据。
提取了15个质量变量的信息,并与癌症登记系统的国际黄金标准进行了比较。
癌症登记处的人口覆盖率从肯尼亚人口的2.3%到冈比亚的100%不等,所有国家都存在严重的城市偏向。然而,有20个国家(3亿人口)没有癌症登记系统。26个登记处中有19个未能满足15项质量标准中的5项以上,只有一个国家满足了10项以上。为卫生提供发展援助的10个最大资助者中有7个引用了GLOBOCAN统计数据来支持政策重点。
2008年全球癌症数据的估计基于从质量较差的癌症登记系统中获取的数据,人口登记覆盖范围有限或没有覆盖。至关重要的是,2012年全球癌症数据的估计应提供有关数据收集质量的信息,并解释估计的局限性。发展组织和世界卫生组织在利用这些数据确定重点和分配资源时需要采取更加谨慎的方法。