Casacchia M, Farolfi A, Priore P, Magni G, Stratta P, Cesana B, Rossi A
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, L'Aquila University, Italy.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1989 Aug;80(2):137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb01315.x.
In this double-blind study alpidem, a new imidazopyridine anxiolytic drug, was compared with placebo to assess its efficacy and safety in severely anxious patients at the fixed dose of 150 mg/day (50 mg t.i.d.) for 3 weeks. Fifty-nine patients with a score of at least 18 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HRSA) entered the trial after a 3- to 7-day placebo run-in period. Symptom improvement was evaluated with the HRSA, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-1 and STAI-2), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Alpidem was more effective than placebo in improving mean HRSA (total score and factorial scores for somatic and psychic anxiety), STAI-1 and STAI-2 and VAS scores. The efficacy index of the CGI was better for alpidem than for placebo. Side effects were negligible in both groups. Alpidem appears to be a new interesting anxiolytic drug devoid of significant sedative effects on mental functions.
在这项双盲研究中,将新型咪唑并吡啶抗焦虑药物阿吡坦与安慰剂进行比较,以评估其对重度焦虑患者的疗效和安全性,固定剂量为每日150毫克(50毫克,每日三次),疗程为3周。59名汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HRSA)评分至少为18分的患者在经过3至7天的安慰剂导入期后进入试验。使用HRSA、状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI-1和STAI-2)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和临床总体印象(CGI)评估症状改善情况。在改善平均HRSA(总分以及躯体和精神焦虑的因子分)、STAI-1和STAI-2以及VAS评分方面,阿吡坦比安慰剂更有效。CGI的疗效指数阿吡坦优于安慰剂。两组的副作用均可忽略不计。阿吡坦似乎是一种新型且有趣的抗焦虑药物,对心理功能无明显镇静作用。