Kumawat Vijay, Sharma Ratti Ram, Malhotra Pankaj, Marwaha Neelam
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015 Jan-Jun;9(1):61-4. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.150953.
This study was designed to determine the prevalence and assess the risk factors responsible for platelet transfusion refractoriness in hemato-oncological patients.
The study included 30 patients. Twelve were clinically diagnosed as aplastic anemia and the 18 were of acute myeloid leukemia. A prospective 3 months follow-up was planned to monitor the response of platelet transfusion therapy, based on their posttransfusion corrected count increment at 1(st) and 24(th) h. Based on the observations, patients were categorized into refractory and nonrefractory groups. Common nonimmunological causes such as fever, sepsis, bleeding, disseminated intravascular coagulation, chemotherapy, splenomegaly, ABO mismatch, and antithymocyte globulin therapy were monitored. Among the immunological causes, presence of antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I antibodies and platelet glycoprotein antibodies in patient's serum were monitored.
During the study period, 17 (56.66%) patients did not show desired platelet count increment. Transfusion requirements of refractory group for both red cell and platelet product were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in comparison to nonrefractory group. Among immunological causes, anti HLA class I antibodies (P < 0.013), antihuman platelet antigen-5b antibodies (P < 0.033) were significantly associated with refractoriness. Among nonimmunological causes, bleeding (P < 0.019, odd ratio 8.7), fever (P < 0.08, odd ratio 5.2), and infection (P < 0.07, odd ratio 5.4) were found to associated with refractoriness.
Platelet refractoriness should be suspected in multitransfused patients not showing expected increment in platelet counts and thoroughly investigated to frame further guidelines in order to ensure proper management of these kind of patients.
本研究旨在确定血液肿瘤患者中血小板输注无效的发生率,并评估其危险因素。
该研究纳入30例患者。其中12例临床诊断为再生障碍性贫血,18例为急性髓系白血病。计划进行为期3个月的前瞻性随访,根据患者输血后1小时和24小时的校正计数增加值来监测血小板输注治疗的反应。根据观察结果,将患者分为难治性和非难治性组。监测常见的非免疫性原因,如发热、败血症、出血、弥散性血管内凝血、化疗、脾肿大、ABO血型不匹配和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白治疗。在免疫性原因方面,监测患者血清中抗人类白细胞抗原(HLA)I类抗体和血小板糖蛋白抗体的存在情况。
在研究期间,17例(56.66%)患者未出现预期的血小板计数增加。与非难治性组相比,难治性组对红细胞和血小板制品的输血需求显著更高(P < 0.05)。在免疫性原因中,抗HLA I类抗体(P < 0.013)、抗人类血小板抗原-5b抗体(P < 0.033)与输注无效显著相关。在非免疫性原因中,出血(P < 0.019,比值比8.7)、发热(P < 0.08,比值比5.2)和感染(P < 0.07,比值比5.4)与输注无效相关。
对于多次输血但血小板计数未出现预期增加的患者,应怀疑血小板输注无效,并进行全面调查以制定进一步的指南,以确保对这类患者进行妥善管理。