Suppr超能文献

血小板输注治疗反应的评估与监测:来自三级医疗中心的经验

Evaluation and monitoring of response to platelet transfusion therapy: experience from a tertiary care center.

作者信息

Chenna Deepika, Shastry Shamee, Baliga Poornima

机构信息

Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

出版信息

Acta Clin Belg. 2021 Aug;76(4):300-303. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1732568. Epub 2020 Feb 22.

Abstract

: Refractoriness to platelet transfusion is defined as Corrected Count Increment (CCI) <5000 after two sequential ABO identical transfusions. Immune causes include alloimmunization to HLA and/or platelet-specific antigens. Analysis of various factors leading to platelet refractoriness would help in the management of the patient in a timely manner.: A prospective observational study on platelet transfusions from November 2013 to June 2015 was conducted. Demographic information, pre, and post-transfusion platelet counts and relevant clinical details were noted. Among patients who were considered refractory to platelet transfusions, platelet factor 3 assay was performed to detect antiplatelet antibodies. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. A P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.: A total of 1190 patients received platelet transfusions during the study period. Among these only 339 (28.5%) patients received transfusions on two or more occasions, of which 237 (69.91%) were considered non-refractory. Among the 102 (30.1%) refractory cases non-immune causes for refractoriness were present in 97 (95.1%) patients and antiplatelet antibody was positive in 18 (17.64%) patients. Bleeding and medication have shown to have significantly contributed to refractoriness (p = 0.025 and 0.003) respectively. Use of medication was independently associated with refractoriness.: Non-immune causes are more profound in leading to a poor response to platelet transfusions. Recognizing the cause of poor response and treating the underlying cause would help in getting a better response.

摘要

血小板输注无效被定义为连续两次 ABO 血型相同的输血后校正计数增加值(CCI)<5000。免疫原因包括对 HLA 和/或血小板特异性抗原的同种免疫。分析导致血小板输注无效的各种因素将有助于及时对患者进行管理。

开展了一项关于 2013 年 11 月至 2015 年 6 月血小板输注的前瞻性观察研究。记录了人口统计学信息、输血前后的血小板计数以及相关临床细节。在被认为对血小板输注无效的患者中,进行血小板因子 3 测定以检测抗血小板抗体。使用 SPSS 软件进行数据分析。P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

在研究期间共有 1190 名患者接受了血小板输注。其中只有 339 名(28.5%)患者接受了两次或更多次输血,其中 237 名(69.91%)被认为不是输注无效。在 102 名(30.1%)输注无效的病例中,97 名(95.1%)患者存在非免疫性输注无效原因,18 名(17.64%)患者抗血小板抗体呈阳性。出血和用药分别显示对输注无效有显著影响(p = 0.025 和 0.003)。用药与输注无效独立相关。

非免疫性原因在导致血小板输注反应不佳方面更为突出。识别反应不佳的原因并治疗潜在病因将有助于获得更好的反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验