Chenna Deepika, Shastry Shamee, Baliga Poornima
Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Acta Clin Belg. 2021 Aug;76(4):300-303. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1732568. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
: Refractoriness to platelet transfusion is defined as Corrected Count Increment (CCI) <5000 after two sequential ABO identical transfusions. Immune causes include alloimmunization to HLA and/or platelet-specific antigens. Analysis of various factors leading to platelet refractoriness would help in the management of the patient in a timely manner.: A prospective observational study on platelet transfusions from November 2013 to June 2015 was conducted. Demographic information, pre, and post-transfusion platelet counts and relevant clinical details were noted. Among patients who were considered refractory to platelet transfusions, platelet factor 3 assay was performed to detect antiplatelet antibodies. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. A P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.: A total of 1190 patients received platelet transfusions during the study period. Among these only 339 (28.5%) patients received transfusions on two or more occasions, of which 237 (69.91%) were considered non-refractory. Among the 102 (30.1%) refractory cases non-immune causes for refractoriness were present in 97 (95.1%) patients and antiplatelet antibody was positive in 18 (17.64%) patients. Bleeding and medication have shown to have significantly contributed to refractoriness (p = 0.025 and 0.003) respectively. Use of medication was independently associated with refractoriness.: Non-immune causes are more profound in leading to a poor response to platelet transfusions. Recognizing the cause of poor response and treating the underlying cause would help in getting a better response.
血小板输注无效被定义为连续两次 ABO 血型相同的输血后校正计数增加值(CCI)<5000。免疫原因包括对 HLA 和/或血小板特异性抗原的同种免疫。分析导致血小板输注无效的各种因素将有助于及时对患者进行管理。
开展了一项关于 2013 年 11 月至 2015 年 6 月血小板输注的前瞻性观察研究。记录了人口统计学信息、输血前后的血小板计数以及相关临床细节。在被认为对血小板输注无效的患者中,进行血小板因子 3 测定以检测抗血小板抗体。使用 SPSS 软件进行数据分析。P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
在研究期间共有 1190 名患者接受了血小板输注。其中只有 339 名(28.5%)患者接受了两次或更多次输血,其中 237 名(69.91%)被认为不是输注无效。在 102 名(30.1%)输注无效的病例中,97 名(95.1%)患者存在非免疫性输注无效原因,18 名(17.64%)患者抗血小板抗体呈阳性。出血和用药分别显示对输注无效有显著影响(p = 0.025 和 0.003)。用药与输注无效独立相关。
非免疫性原因在导致血小板输注反应不佳方面更为突出。识别反应不佳的原因并治疗潜在病因将有助于获得更好的反应。