• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质切开辅助牵张:一项疗效评估。

Corticotomy-assisted retraction: an outcome assessment.

作者信息

Sakthi S Vijayashri, Vikraman B, Shobana V R, Iyer S Kavitha, Krishnaswamy N R

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;25(6):748-54. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.152191.

DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.152191
PMID:25728107
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficiency and treatment outcome of patients treated with corticotomy-assisted en-masse orthodontic retraction as compared with the en-masse retraction without corticotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion requiring correction of bidental proclination constituted the sample. The study group consisted of 22 patients (male 11, female 11) willing to undergo surgery to reduce the duration of their orthodontic treatment and 18 patients (male 9, female 9) desirous of undergoing conventional orthodontic treatment without surgical intervention constituted the control group. Comparison of rate of retraction and anchor loss between the study and the control group was assessed.

RESULTS

Average rate of space closure of 1.8 mm/month in the maxilla and 1.57 mm/month in the mandible was observed in the study group compared to 1.02 mm/month in the maxilla and 0.87 mm/month in the mandible in the control group. The rate of retraction accelerated during the first 2 months of retraction. Molar anchor loss of approximately 0.6 mm occurred in the study group, and 1.8 mm occurred in the control group during the 4 months.

CONCLUSION

The rate of retraction with study group was twice as faster when compared to the control group, accelerating during the first 2 months of retraction. There was better anchorage control with the undecorticated molar segment during the retraction period but was found to increase as time advanced.

摘要

背景

评估皮质骨切开辅助整体正畸后移与非皮质骨切开整体后移患者的治疗效率和治疗结果。

材料与方法

样本包括40例需要矫正双牙列前突的成年患者。研究组由22例(男11例,女11例)愿意接受手术以缩短正畸治疗时间的患者组成,18例(男9例,女9例)希望接受非手术常规正畸治疗的患者组成对照组。评估研究组与对照组之间的后移速率和支抗丧失情况。

结果

研究组上颌平均每月关闭间隙1.8 mm,下颌为1.57 mm;而对照组上颌为1.02 mm/月,下颌为0.87 mm/月。后移速率在开始后移的前2个月加快。在4个月期间,研究组磨牙支抗丧失约0.6 mm,对照组为1.8 mm。

结论

研究组的后移速率是对照组的两倍,在开始后移的前2个月加快。在牙齿后移期间,未行皮质骨切开的磨牙段支抗控制较好,但随着时间推移支抗丧失增加。

相似文献

1
Corticotomy-assisted retraction: an outcome assessment.皮质切开辅助牵张:一项疗效评估。
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;25(6):748-54. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.152191.
2
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.双颌前突患者使用间接加载微型螺钉整体后移过程中支抗丧失的定量和定性评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.014.
3
Friction versus frictionless mechanics during maxillary en-masse retraction in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a randomized clinical trial.上颌骨整体后退治疗 I 类双颌前突成人患者时的摩擦力与无摩擦力机制:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae034.
4
En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.成人上颌或双颌牙牙槽突前突患者上前牙整体后缩:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):113-127.
5
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.成人上颌牙牙槽骨前突患者使用骨锚固与口外锚固治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
6
Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.随机临床试验比较两种后牵引技术对上颌支抗控制的效果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.027.
7
Treatment of bimaxillary protrusion with temporary anchorage devices.应用临时锚固装置治疗双颌前突
J Oral Sci. 2018;60(2):316-319. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0152.
8
Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.微型种植体支抗用于上颌前牙整体后移:一项临床头影测量研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Dec;134(6):803-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.025.
9
Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.微型种植体支抗上颌尖牙内收联合与不联合骨皮质切开术的正畸治疗。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Feb;139(2):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.028.
10
Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.上颌前突牙列治疗效果的三维牙科模型分析:头帽、微螺钉和微型钛板骨锚固的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):636-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of piezocision in accelerating maxillary anterior teeth en-masse retraction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.超声骨刀辅助上颌前牙整体内收加速移动的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 7;23(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06389-4.
2
Is It Possible to Achieve Favorable Accelerated Dental Changes with No Periodontal Complications When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy? A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.在上颌前牙瓣外皮质切开术辅助内收与传统皮质切开术相比,是否可以实现无牙周并发症的有利加速牙齿移动?一项双臂随机对照试验。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 Mar 7;2022:4261248. doi: 10.1155/2022/4261248. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect of piezocision corticotomy on en-masse retraction.骨切开术对整体回缩的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Sep 1;90(5):648-654. doi: 10.2319/092719-615.1.
4
Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.与传统支抗两步法内收相比,临时骨锚式装置内收治疗牙列牙槽突前突患者的疗效评估:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):513-523. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_661_18.
5
A systematic analysis of evidence for surgically accelerated orthodontics.手术加速正畸学证据的系统分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Sep 1;11(9):e829-e838. doi: 10.4317/jced.56048. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Periodontal Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics Technique for Rapid Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review.用于快速正畸牙齿移动的牙周加速成骨正畸技术:一项系统评价
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S97-S106. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_298_18.
7
Corticotomy for orthodontic tooth movement.用于正畸牙齿移动的皮质骨切开术。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;44(6):251-258. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.251. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
8
SURGICAL AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH BIMAXILLARY PROTRUSION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.双颌前突患者的外科及正畸治疗方法——一项系统评价
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):31-46.
9
The effectiveness of corticotomy and piezocision on canine retraction: A systematic review.皮质切开术和压电切开术对犬牙后移的有效性:一项系统评价。
Korean J Orthod. 2018 May;48(3):200-211. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.200. Epub 2018 Apr 20.