De Backer Ole, Arnous Samer, Sandholt Benjamin, Brooks Matthew, Biasco Luigi, Franzen Olaf, Lönn Lars, Bech Bo, Søndergaard Lars
Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.547. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Vascular access complications (VACs) remain one of the biggest challenges when performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to investigate the short- and medium-term safety and efficacy of the Viabahn endoprosthesis (Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) when used to treat TAVI-induced vascular injury. Over a 40-month period, 354 patients underwent true percutaneous transfemoral (TF)-TAVI using a CoreValve and Prostar-XL closure system; this was our study population. A VAC leading to acute intervention occurred in 72 patients (20.3%) - of these, 18 were managed by balloon angioplasty, 48 were treated by Viabahn stenting (technical success rate 98%), and 6 needed surgical intervention. Overall, this approach resulted in a major VAC rate of 3.1% (n = 11) in our study cohort. Length of hospitalization and 30-day mortality rates were comparable in patients with a VAC treated by Viabahn stenting versus patients without vascular complications. Two patients (4.5%) presented with new-onset claudication; one of them had the stent implanted covering the deep femoral artery (DFA). At medium-term follow-up (median 372 days; range 55 to 978 days) duplex ultrasound showed 100% patency of the Viabahn endoprostheses with no signs of stent fracture or in-stent stenosis/occlusion. In conclusion, the use of self-expanding covered stents is safe and effective in case of TF-TAVI-induced vascular injury, with good short- and medium-term outcomes. Importantly, coverage of the DFA should be avoided. If confirmed by long-term (>5 years) follow-up studies, this strategy for treating TAVI-induced VAC may be used routinely in high-risk patients.
血管通路并发症(VACs)仍然是进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)时面临的最大挑战之一。本研究旨在探讨Viabahn血管内假体(戈尔公司,弗拉格斯塔夫,亚利桑那州)用于治疗TAVI引起的血管损伤时的短期和中期安全性及有效性。在40个月的时间里,354例患者使用CoreValve和Prostar-XL闭合系统接受了真正的经皮股动脉(TF)-TAVI;这是我们的研究人群。72例患者(20.3%)发生了需要紧急干预的VAC,其中18例通过球囊血管成形术处理,48例接受Viabahn支架置入治疗(技术成功率98%),6例需要手术干预。总体而言,在我们的研究队列中,这种方法导致主要VAC发生率为3.1%(n = 11)。接受Viabahn支架置入治疗的VAC患者与无血管并发症的患者相比,住院时间和30天死亡率相当。2例患者(4.5%)出现新发跛行;其中1例的支架植入覆盖了股深动脉(DFA)。在中期随访(中位时间372天;范围55至978天)时,双功超声显示Viabahn血管内假体通畅率为100%,无支架断裂或支架内狭窄/闭塞迹象。总之,对于TF-TAVI引起的血管损伤,使用自膨式覆膜支架是安全有效的,短期和中期结果良好。重要的是,应避免覆盖DFA。如果长期(>5年)随访研究证实,这种治疗TAVI引起的VAC的策略可在高危患者中常规使用。