Wolfe Jace, John Andrew, Schafer Erin, Hudson Mary, Boretzki Michael, Scollie Susan, Woods Whitney, Wheeler Julie, Hudgens Krystal, Neumann Sara
* Hearts for Hearing , Oklahoma City , USA.
Int J Audiol. 2015 Mar;54(3):170-81. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.943845.
To evaluate wideband amplification and non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) as a means to improve speech recognition for children with mild/moderate hearing loss.
Randomized within-subject design with repeated measures across test conditions.
Eleven children with mild to moderate hearing loss were evaluated with: (1) Phonak BTE without NLFC, (2) Phonak BTE with NLFC, and (3) Oticon BTE with wideband response extending to 8000 Hz.
Use of NLFC provided better detection and recognition of high-frequency stimuli (e.g. /sh/ and /s/). No difference in performance between conditions was observed for speech recognition when measured with the University of Western Ontario (UWO) plurals test and the UWO distinctive features difference test. Finally, there were no differences between conditions on the BKB-SIN test.
Children with mild to moderate hearing loss have good access to high-frequency phonemes presented at fixed levels (e.g. 50 to 60 dBA) with both wideband and NLFC technology. Similarly, sentence recognition in noise was similar with wideband and NLFC. Adaptive test procedures that probe performance at lower input levels showed small but significant improvements in the detection and recognition of the phonemes /s/ and /sh/ with NLFC condition when compared to the NLFC Off and wideband conditions.
评估宽带放大和非线性频率压缩(NLFC)作为改善轻度/中度听力损失儿童语音识别的一种手段。
在测试条件下采用重复测量的随机受试者内设计。
对11名轻度至中度听力损失儿童进行了评估,评估方式包括:(1)不带NLFC的峰力耳背式助听器(BTE);(2)带NLFC的峰力耳背式助听器;(3)具有扩展至8000 Hz宽带响应的奥迪康耳背式助听器。
使用NLFC能更好地检测和识别高频刺激(如/sh/和/s/)。使用西安大略大学(UWO)复数测试和UWO独特特征差异测试测量语音识别时,各条件下的表现没有差异。最后,在BKB - SIN测试中各条件之间也没有差异。
轻度至中度听力损失儿童通过宽带和NLFC技术都能很好地接收到固定水平(如50至60 dBA)呈现的高频音素。同样,宽带和NLFC在噪声中的句子识别相似。与NLFC关闭和宽带条件相比,在较低输入水平探测表现的自适应测试程序显示,在NLFC条件下,/s/和/sh/音素的检测和识别有微小但显著的改善。