Suppr超能文献

右心室流出道室性早搏患者风险分层中的逐搏T波振幅变异性

Beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability in the risk stratification of right ventricular outflow tract-premature ventricular complex patients.

作者信息

Ichikawa Tomohide, Sobue Yoshihiro, Kasai Atsunobu, Kiyono Ken, Hayano Junichiro, Yamamoto Mayumi, Okuda Kentarou, Watanabe Eiichi, Ozaki Yukio

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.

Division of Cardiology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Japan.

出版信息

Europace. 2016 Jan;18(1):138-45. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu404. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

Abstract

AIMS

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) may occasionally trigger monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT), polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF). We examined whether an analysis of the ventricular repolarization instability could differentiate PVT/VF triggered by RVOT-PVCs from benign RVOT-PVCs or MVT.

METHODS

We evaluated the ventricular repolarization instability as assessed by the beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability (TAV) using Holter recordings in patients with RVOT-PVCs but with no structural heart disease. We determined the prematurity index, defined as the ratio of the coupling interval of the first ventricular tachycardia (VT) beat or isolated PVC to the preceding R-R interval just before the VT or isolated PVC in the Holter recordings. The study patients were classified into RVOT-PVCs/MVT (n = 33) and PVT/VF (n = 10).

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ with respect to the age, sex, and left ventricular ejection fraction. There was no significant difference in the prematurity index between the two groups (RVOT-PVCs/MVT 0.66 ± 0.16 vs. PVT/VF 0.61 ± 0.13, P = 0.60). The patients with PVT/VF had a significantly larger maximum TAV than those with RVOT-PVCs/MVT (31 ± 13 vs. 68 ± 40 µV, P < 0.001). Patients with a higher than median value of the TAV (33 µV) were at increased risk of PVT/VF vs. those with a lower than median value, after adjusting for the age and sex [9.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.27-19.2); P = 0.03].

CONCLUSIONS

The TAV analysis is a useful measure to identify the subset of usually benign RVOT-PVC/MVT patients prone to PVT/VF.

摘要

目的

起源于右心室流出道(RVOT)的室性早搏(PVC)偶尔可引发单形性室性心动过速(MVT)、多形性室性心动过速(PVT)或心室颤动(VF)。我们研究了心室复极不稳定性分析是否能够区分由RVOT-PVC引发的PVT/VF与良性RVOT-PVC或MVT。

方法

我们使用动态心电图记录评估了RVOT-PVC但无结构性心脏病患者的逐搏T波振幅变异性(TAV),以此来评估心室复极不稳定性。我们确定了提前指数,其定义为动态心电图记录中第一个室性心动过速(VT)搏动或孤立PVC的联律间期与VT或孤立PVC之前的R-R间期之比。研究患者分为RVOT-PVCs/MVT组(n = 33)和PVT/VF组(n = 10)。

结果

两组在年龄、性别和左心室射血分数方面无差异。两组之间的提前指数无显著差异(RVOT-PVCs/MVT为0.66±0.16,PVT/VF为0.61±0.13,P = 0.60)。PVT/VF患者的最大TAV显著大于RVOT-PVCs/MVT患者(31±13对68±40 μV,P < 0.001)。在校正年龄和性别后,TAV高于中位数(33 μV)的患者发生PVT/VF的风险高于TAV低于中位数的患者[9.25(95%置信区间:1.27 - 19.2);P = 0.03]。

结论

TAV分析是识别通常为良性的RVOT-PVC/MVT患者中易发生PVT/VF亚组的有用方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验