Harris Alex H S, Ellerbe Laura, Phelps Tyler E, Finney John W, Bowe Thomas, Gupta Shalini, Asch Steven M, Humphreys Keith, Trafton Jodie
Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, 795 Willow Road (MPD152), Menlo Park, CA 94025.
Program Evaluation and Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, 795 Willow Road (MPD152), Menlo Park, CA 94025.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Jun;53:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
Accurate operationalization is a major challenge in developing quality measures for substance use disorder treatment. Specification validity is a term used to describe whether a quality measure is operationalized such that it captures the intended care processes and patients. This study assessed the specification validity of the 2009 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS®) substance use disorder initiation and engagement measures by examining whether encounters assumed to include relevant treatment have corroborating evidence in the clinical progress notes. The positive predictive values were excellent (>90%) for residential and outpatient records selected from addiction treatment programs but more modest for records generated in non-addiction settings, and were highly variable across facilities. Stakeholders using these measures to compare care quality should be mindful of the clinical composition of the data and determine if similar validation work has been conducted on the systems being evaluated.
在制定物质使用障碍治疗的质量指标时,准确的操作化是一项重大挑战。规范效度是一个术语,用于描述质量指标是否经过操作化处理,从而能够涵盖预期的护理过程和患者。本研究通过检查假定包含相关治疗的诊疗记录在临床病程记录中是否有确证依据,评估了2009年医疗保健有效性数据和信息集(HEDIS®)中物质使用障碍起始和参与指标的规范效度。从成瘾治疗项目中选取的住院和门诊记录的阳性预测值极佳(>90%),但在非成瘾环境中生成的记录的阳性预测值则较为一般,且各机构之间差异很大。使用这些指标来比较护理质量的利益相关者应注意数据的临床构成,并确定在所评估的系统上是否已开展类似的验证工作。