Suppr超能文献

验证 HEDIS 成瘾质量测量的治疗识别策略:与病历审查的一致性。

Validation of the treatment identification strategy of the HEDIS addiction quality measures: concordance with medical record review.

机构信息

Center for Health Care Evaluation (MPD:152), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 11;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-73.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strategies to accurately identify the occurrence of specific health care events in administrative data is central to many quality improvement and research efforts. Many health care quality measures have treatment identification strategies based on diagnosis and procedure codes - an approach that is inexpensive and feasible but usually of unknown validity. In this study, we examined if the diagnosis/procedure code combinations used in the 2006 HEDIS Initiation and Engagement quality measures to identify instances of addiction treatment have high concordance with documentation of addiction treatment in clinical progress notes.

METHODS

Four type of records were randomly sampled from VHA electronic medical data: (a) Outpatient records from a substance use disorder (SUD) specialty clinic with a HEDIS-qualified substance use disorder (SUD) diagnosis/CPT code combination (n = 700), (b) Outpatient records from a non-SUD setting with a HEDIS-qualified SUD diagnosis/CPT code combination (n = 592), (c) Specialty SUD Inpatient/residential records that included a SUD diagnosis (n = 700), and (d) Non-SUD specialty Inpatient/residential records that included a SUD diagnosis (n = 700). Clinical progress notes for the sampled records were extracted and two raters classified each as documenting or not documenting addiction treatment. Rates of concordance between the HEDIS addiction treatment identification strategy and the raters' judgments were calculated for each record type.

RESULTS

Within SUD outpatient clinics and SUD inpatient specialty units, 92% and 98% of sampled records had chart evidence of addiction treatment. Of outpatient encounters with a qualifying diagnosis/procedure code combination outside of SUD clinics, 63% had chart evidence of addiction treatment. Within non-SUD specialty inpatient units, only 46% of sampled records had chart evidence of addiction treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For records generated in SUD specialty settings, the HEDIS strategy of identifying SUD treatment with diagnosis and procedure codes has a high concordance with chart review. The concordance rate outside of SUD specialty settings is much lower and highly variable between facilities. Therefore, some patients may be counted as meeting the 2006 HEDIS Initiation and Engagement criteria without having received the specified amount (or any) addiction treatment.

摘要

背景

在行政数据中准确识别特定医疗保健事件的发生策略是许多质量改进和研究工作的核心。许多医疗保健质量措施都有基于诊断和程序代码的治疗识别策略 - 这种方法成本低廉且可行,但通常有效性未知。在这项研究中,我们检查了 2006 年 HEDIS 启动和参与质量措施中用于识别成瘾治疗实例的诊断/程序代码组合是否与临床进展记录中记录的成瘾治疗高度一致。

方法

从 VHA 电子病历中随机抽取四种类型的记录:(a) 具有 HEDIS 合格物质使用障碍(SUD)诊断/CPT 代码组合的 SUD 专科诊所的门诊记录(n = 700),(b) 具有 HEDIS 合格 SUD 诊断/CPT 代码组合的非 SUD 环境中的门诊记录(n = 592),(c) 包括 SUD 诊断的专科 SUD 住院/住院记录(n = 700),以及(d) 包括 SUD 诊断的非 SUD 专科住院/住院记录(n = 700)。抽取记录的临床进展记录并由两名评分者将每个记录分类为记录或未记录成瘾治疗。为每种记录类型计算 HEDIS 成瘾治疗识别策略与评分者判断之间的一致性率。

结果

在 SUD 门诊诊所和 SUD 专科住院病房中,92%和 98%的抽样记录有成瘾治疗的图表证据。在 SUD 诊所外有资格诊断/程序代码组合的门诊就诊中,有 63%的记录有成瘾治疗的图表证据。在非 SUD 专科住院病房中,只有 46%的抽样记录有成瘾治疗的图表证据。

结论

对于在 SUD 专科环境中生成的记录,使用诊断和程序代码识别 SUD 治疗的 HEDIS 策略与图表审查具有高度一致性。在非 SUD 专科环境之外,一致性率要低得多,并且在不同设施之间差异很大。因此,一些患者可能被计算为符合 2006 年 HEDIS 启动和参与标准,而没有接受规定数量(或任何)的成瘾治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验