Müller Astrid, Smits Dirk, Jasper Stefanie, Berg Lea, Claes Laurence, Ipaktchi Ramin, Vogt Peter M, de Zwaan Martina
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Odisee University College, Brussels, Belgium; Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) is recognized as a valid self-rating scale to evaluate quality of life after burn.
To validate the translated German version of the BSHS-B.
One hundred and forty one burn survivors (65.2% men) with a mean age of 49.62 years (SD=15.16) and a mean duration after burn of 45.01 months (SD=26.18) answered the BSHS-B. Factor structure was tested by using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability (internal consistency) of the scales was determined by means of Cronbach's α. Construct validity was explored through correlations between the BSHS-B and the Short-Form 8 Health Survey (SF-8). In addition, the know-groups technique was used to determine to which degree the BSHS-B discriminates between patients with low and high burn severity based on the abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to examine criterion validity.
The nine BSHS-B subscales showed good internal consistency. A second-order confirmatory factor analysis revealed the following main components: (1) Affect and Relationship, (2) Function and (3) Skin Involvement. The second-order factors were positively correlated with the SF-8 and negatively correlated with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Patients with low ABSI scored higher on all three BSHS-B domains than those with high ABSI.
The results indicate good psychometric properties of the German BSHS-B. Further studies are needed to investigate the utility of the questionnaire in clinical routine practice, evaluation of burn management programs, and burn-specific research.
烧伤特异性健康量表简版(BSHS - B)被认为是评估烧伤后生活质量的有效自评量表。
验证BSHS - B德语翻译版本的有效性。
141名烧伤幸存者(65.2%为男性),平均年龄49.62岁(标准差 = 15.16),烧伤后平均病程45.01个月(标准差 = 26.18),回答了BSHS - B量表。通过验证性因素分析测试因素结构,量表的信度(内部一致性)通过克朗巴哈α系数确定。通过BSHS - B与简短健康调查8项量表(SF - 8)之间的相关性探索结构效度。此外,采用已知群体技术根据简化烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)确定BSHS - B在区分低烧伤严重程度和高烧伤严重程度患者方面的程度。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)检查效标效度。
BSHS - B的九个分量表显示出良好的内部一致性。二阶验证性因素分析揭示了以下主要成分:(1)情感与人际关系,(2)功能,以及(3)皮肤受累情况。二阶因素与SF - 8呈正相关,与焦虑和抑郁症状呈负相关。ABSI低的患者在BSHS - B的所有三个领域的得分均高于ABSI高的患者。
结果表明德语版BSHS - B具有良好的心理测量学特性。需要进一步研究以调查该问卷在临床常规实践、烧伤管理项目评估和烧伤特异性研究中的效用。