van Rooij Willemijn M J, Senden Rachel, Heyligers Ide C, Cuppen Paul M A H, van Hemert Wouter L W, Grimm Bernd
a AHORSE Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology , Atrium Medical Centre Heerlen , The Netherlands and.
b Cheiron Medical Centre Waalre , Waalre , The Netherlands.
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(24):2257-63. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019010. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
Physical functioning is a multidimensional construct covering perceived functioning, functional capacity and actual physical activity. Currently, the assessment of physical functioning in low back pain (LBP) patients has been limited to only one or two of these aspects. This study evaluates physical functioning of LBP patients by assessing the three individual aspects using questionnaires and ambulant sensor-based measurements.
Actual physical activity, functional capacity and perceived functioning were measured in 26 patients undergoing patient specific treatment before, direct and 3-4 weeks after the first treatment using, respectively, sensor-based activity monitoring, sensor-based motion analysis test and the Oswestry questionnaire. Patients were compared to a healthy control group.
Perceived functioning and functional capacity, but not actual physical activity is impaired in pre-treatment LBP patients. After treatment, patients improved in perceived physical functioning and functional capacity approaching healthy levels, however only slight (p > 0.05) improvements in actual physical activity were found. Moreover, only few and weak correlations were found between the different aspects of physical functioning.
Perceived functioning, actual physical activity and functional capacity are three independent outcome dimensions, being complementary but not redundant. Especially, perceived functioning and physical capacity need attention when evaluating LBP patients during rehabilitation. Implications for Rehabilitation Perceived physical functioning and physical capacity are negatively affected by low back pain and improve after treatment. Low back pain patients perform their daily activity independent of pain and complaints. Inertia sensor-based motion analysis can objectify treatment effects showing low back pain patients their progress in rehabilitation. New interventions can be justified with inertia sensor technology in low back pain patients.
身体功能是一个多维概念,涵盖感知功能、功能能力和实际身体活动。目前,对腰痛(LBP)患者身体功能的评估仅限于这些方面中的一两个。本研究通过使用问卷和基于移动传感器的测量方法评估这三个独立方面,来评价LBP患者的身体功能。
分别使用基于传感器的活动监测、基于传感器的运动分析测试和奥斯威斯利问卷,对26例接受个体化治疗的患者在首次治疗前、治疗期间和首次治疗后3 - 4周测量其实际身体活动、功能能力和感知功能。将患者与健康对照组进行比较。
治疗前LBP患者的感知功能和功能能力受损,但实际身体活动未受损。治疗后,患者的感知身体功能和功能能力有所改善,接近健康水平,但实际身体活动仅略有改善(p > 0.05)。此外,身体功能的不同方面之间仅发现少数且微弱的相关性。
感知功能、实际身体活动和功能能力是三个独立的结果维度,相互补充但并非冗余。特别是在评估LBP患者康复过程中,感知功能和身体能力需要关注。对康复的启示 感知身体功能和身体能力受到腰痛的负面影响,治疗后有所改善。腰痛患者独立于疼痛和不适进行日常活动。基于惯性传感器的运动分析可以客观化治疗效果,向腰痛患者展示他们在康复中的进展。惯性传感器技术可为腰痛患者的新干预措施提供依据。