Vavalle Nicholas A, Davis Matthew L, Stitzel Joel D, Gayzik F Scott
Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 575 N. Patterson Avenue, Suite 120, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA,
Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Sep;43(9):2163-74. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1286-7. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Validation is a critical step in finite element model (FEM) development. This study focuses on the validation of the Global Human Body Models Consortium full body average male occupant FEM in five localized loading regimes-a chest impact, a shoulder impact, a thoracoabdominal impact, an abdominal impact, and a pelvic impact. Force and deflection outputs from the model were compared to experimental traces and corridors scaled to the 50th percentile male. Predicted fractures and injury severity measures were compared to evaluate the model's injury prediction capabilities. The methods of ISO/TS 18571 were used to quantitatively assess the fit of model outputs to experimental force and deflection traces. The model produced peak chest, shoulder, thoracoabdominal, abdominal, and pelvis forces of 4.8, 3.3, 4.5, 5.1, and 13.0 kN compared to 4.3, 3.2, 4.0, 4.0, and 10.3 kN in the experiments, respectively. The model predicted rib and pelvic fractures related to Abbreviated Injury Scale scores within the ranges found experimentally all cases except the abdominal impact. ISO/TS 18571 scores for the impacts studied had a mean score of 0.73 with a range of 0.57-0.83. Well-validated FEMs are important tools used by engineers in advancing occupant safety.
验证是有限元模型(FEM)开发中的关键步骤。本研究聚焦于全球人体模型联盟全身体平均男性乘员有限元模型在五种局部加载工况下的验证,即胸部撞击、肩部撞击、胸腹撞击、腹部撞击和骨盆撞击。将模型的力和位移输出与按第50百分位男性缩放的实验轨迹和通道进行比较。比较预测的骨折和损伤严重程度指标以评估模型的损伤预测能力。采用ISO/TS 18571的方法定量评估模型输出与实验力和位移轨迹的拟合度。模型产生的胸部、肩部、胸腹、腹部和骨盆的峰值力分别为4.8、3.3、4.5、5.1和13.0 kN,而实验中的相应值分别为4.3、3.2、4.0、4.0和10.3 kN。除腹部撞击外,在所有情况下,模型预测的与简略损伤量表评分相关的肋骨和骨盆骨折均在实验发现的范围内。所研究撞击的ISO/TS 18571评分平均为0.73,范围为0.57 - 0.83。经过充分验证的有限元模型是工程师推进乘员安全工作的重要工具。