Cotrim Enio Ribeiro, Vasconcelos Júnior Átila Valadares, Haddad Ana Cristina Soares Santos, Reis Sílvia Augusta Braga
Sérgio Feitosa Institute for Health Studies and Management.
IES.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):40-4. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.040-044.oar.
Smile esthetics has become a major concern among patients and orthodontists. Therefore, the aim of this study was: (1) To highlight differences in perception of smile esthetics by clinicians, orthodontists and laypeople; (2) To assess factors such as lip thickness, smile height, color gradation, tooth size and crowding, and which are associated with smile unpleasantness.
To this end, edited photographs emphasizing the lower third of the face of 41 subjects were assessed by three groups (orthodontists, laypeople and clinicians) who graded the smiles from 1 to 9, highlighting the markers that evince smile unpleasantness. Kruskall-Wallis test supplemented by Bonferroni test was used to assess differences among groups. Additionally, the prevailing factors in smile unpleasantness were also described.
There was no significant difference (P = 0.67) among groups rates. However, the groups highlighted different characteristics associated with smile unpleasantness. Orthodontists emphasized little gingival display, whereas laypeople emphasized disproportionate teeth and clinicians emphasized yellow teeth.
Orthodontists, laypeople and clinicians similarly assess smile esthetics; however, noticing different characteristics. Thus, the orthodontist must be careful not to impose his own perception of smile esthetics.
微笑美学已成为患者和正畸医生主要关注的问题。因此,本研究的目的是:(1)突出临床医生、正畸医生和外行人对微笑美学认知的差异;(2)评估诸如嘴唇厚度、微笑高度、颜色渐变、牙齿大小和拥挤程度等与微笑不美观相关的因素。
为此,由三组人员(正畸医生、外行人、临床医生)对41名受试者强调面部下三分之一的编辑照片进行评估,他们将微笑从1到9进行评分,突出显示表明微笑不美观的特征。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验并辅以Bonferroni检验来评估组间差异。此外,还描述了微笑不美观的主要因素。
组间评分无显著差异(P = 0.67)。然而,各组突出显示了与微笑不美观相关的不同特征。正畸医生强调牙龈暴露少,而外行人强调牙齿比例失调,临床医生强调牙齿发黄。
正畸医生、外行人、临床医生对微笑美学的评估相似,但注意到的特征不同。因此,正畸医生必须注意不要将自己对微笑美学的认知强加于人。