Bacon Phoebe L, Harris Erin D, Ziniel Sonja I, Savage Sarah K, Weitzman Elissa R, Green Robert C, Huntington Noelle L, Holm Ingrid A
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):107-20. doi: 10.1177/1556264615572092. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
Understanding participants' preferences for the return of individual research results (IRR) in genomic research may allow for the implementation of more beneficial result disclosure methods. We tested four preference-setting models through cognitive interviews of parents to explore how parents conceptualize the process of setting preferences and which disease characteristics they believe to be most important when deciding what results to receive on their child. Severity and preventability of a condition were highly influential in decision making and certain groups of research results were anticipated by participants to have negative psychological effects. These findings informed the development of an educational tool and preference-setting model that can be scaled for use in the return of IRR from large biobank studies.
了解参与者对基因组研究中个人研究结果(IRR)反馈的偏好,可能有助于实施更有益的结果披露方法。我们通过对父母进行认知访谈,测试了四种偏好设定模型,以探讨父母如何理解设定偏好的过程,以及他们认为在决定孩子接受何种结果时哪些疾病特征最为重要。疾病的严重程度和可预防性在决策中具有高度影响力,并且参与者预计某些研究结果组会产生负面心理影响。这些发现为一种教育工具和偏好设定模型的开发提供了依据,该模型可扩大规模用于大型生物样本库研究的IRR反馈。