Huff G R, Huff W E, Rath N C, El-Gohary F A, Zhou Z Y, Shini S
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AR 72701
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Poult Sci. 2015 May;94(5):918-26. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev068. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Prebiotics consisting of resistant starch may alter intestinal ecology, thus modulating inflammation and increasing intestinal health through increased cecal production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). Probiotics may directly alter the intestinal microbiome, resulting in the same effects. We hypothesize that adding prebiotics and probiotics to feed may protect the gut of young chicks under stress. Studies 1, 2, and 3 evaluated treatments in a cold stress (CS) and Escherichia coli (EC) oral challenge to 430 day-old broiler chicks for 3 wk. In study 1, prebiotics were administered as 15% of the diet during the first week only and consisted of the following: Hi-Maize resistant starch (HM), potato starch (PS), or raw potato (RP). In studies 2 and 3, the PS treatment was identical to study 1, and an additional probiotic treatment (PRO) was administered in feed and water. In study 1, PS protected BW during the first week and decreased the mortality of CS/EC-challenged birds during the first week and wk 3, while RP decreased the mortality of warm-brooded birds challenged with EC during the first week. In study 2, PS decreased and PRO increased the main effect mean (MEM) of the first week BW. PS and PRO numerically decreased the feed conversion ratio (FCR) by 23 and 29 points, respectively, in CS/EC-challenged birds with no effects on mortality. In study 3, PS decreased and PRO increased the first week and wk 3 MEM BW. PS numerically increased FCR by 16 points, while PRO decreased FCR by 2 points. Both PS and PRO tended to increase overall mortality, and PRO significantly increased mortality in the CS/EC challenge. These results suggest that the effects of PS may be too variable in this challenge model for further study; however, the PRO treatment improved production values and may have potential as an alternative to antibiotics during the first weeks after hatch.
由抗性淀粉组成的益生元可能会改变肠道生态,从而通过增加盲肠短链脂肪酸(SCFA)的产生来调节炎症并增进肠道健康。益生菌可能会直接改变肠道微生物群,产生相同的效果。我们假设在饲料中添加益生元和益生菌可以保护处于应激状态下的幼雏肠道。研究1、2和3评估了对430只1日龄肉鸡雏鸡进行3周冷应激(CS)和口服大肠杆菌(EC)挑战的处理。在研究1中,益生元仅在第一周以日粮的15%进行投喂,其组成如下:高直链玉米抗性淀粉(HM)、马铃薯淀粉(PS)或生马铃薯(RP)。在研究2和3中,PS处理与研究1相同,另外在饲料和饮水中添加了益生菌处理(PRO)。在研究1中,PS在第一周保护了体重,降低了CS/EC攻击鸡在第一周和第3周的死亡率,而RP降低了第一周受到EC攻击的暖育鸡的死亡率。在研究2中,PS降低了而PRO增加了第一周体重的主效应均值(MEM)。在CS/EC攻击的鸡中,PS和PRO分别使饲料转化率(FCR)在数值上降低了23和29个百分点,对死亡率没有影响。在研究3中,PS降低了而PRO增加了第一周和第3周的MEM体重。PS在数值上使FCR增加了16个百分点,而PRO使FCR降低了2个百分点。PS和PRO都倾向于增加总体死亡率,并且PRO在CS/EC攻击中显著增加了死亡率。这些结果表明,在这个挑战模型中,PS的效果可能变化太大,无法进行进一步研究;然而,PRO处理提高了生产指标,并且在雏鸡出壳后的头几周可能有作为抗生素替代品的潜力。