Hammer Rubi, Sloutsky Vladimir, Grill-Spector Kalanit
Department of Psychology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA ; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA ; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA.
Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 19;6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00074. eCollection 2015.
Visual category learning (VCL) involves detecting which features are most relevant for categorization. VCL relies on attentional learning, which enables effectively redirecting attention to object's features most relevant for categorization, while 'filtering out' irrelevant features. When features relevant for categorization are not salient, VCL relies also on perceptual learning, which enables becoming more sensitive to subtle yet important differences between objects. Little is known about how attentional learning and perceptual learning interact when VCL relies on both processes at the same time. Here we tested this interaction. Participants performed VCL tasks in which they learned to categorize novel stimuli by detecting the feature dimension relevant for categorization. Tasks varied both in feature saliency (low-saliency tasks that required perceptual learning vs. high-saliency tasks), and in feedback information (tasks with mid-information, moderately ambiguous feedback that increased attentional load, vs. tasks with high-information non-ambiguous feedback). We found that mid-information and high-information feedback were similarly effective for VCL in high-saliency tasks. This suggests that an increased attentional load, associated with the processing of moderately ambiguous feedback, has little effect on VCL when features are salient. In low-saliency tasks, VCL relied on slower perceptual learning; but when the feedback was highly informative participants were able to ultimately attain the same performance as during the high-saliency VCL tasks. However, VCL was significantly compromised in the low-saliency mid-information feedback task. We suggest that such low-saliency mid-information learning scenarios are characterized by a 'cognitive loop paradox' where two interdependent learning processes have to take place simultaneously.
视觉类别学习(VCL)涉及检测哪些特征与分类最相关。VCL依赖于注意力学习,这使得能够有效地将注意力重新引导到与分类最相关的对象特征上,同时“过滤掉”不相关的特征。当与分类相关的特征不明显时,VCL还依赖于知觉学习,这使得对对象之间细微但重要的差异变得更加敏感。当VCL同时依赖这两个过程时,关于注意力学习和知觉学习如何相互作用知之甚少。在这里,我们测试了这种相互作用。参与者执行VCL任务,在这些任务中,他们通过检测与分类相关的特征维度来学习对新刺激进行分类。任务在特征显著性(需要知觉学习的低显著性任务与高显著性任务)和反馈信息(具有中等信息、适度模糊反馈从而增加注意力负荷的任务与具有高信息明确反馈的任务)方面都有所不同。我们发现,在高显著性任务中,中等信息和高信息反馈对VCL同样有效。这表明,与处理适度模糊反馈相关的注意力负荷增加,在特征显著时对VCL影响很小。在低显著性任务中,VCL依赖于较慢的知觉学习;但当反馈信息丰富时,参与者最终能够达到与高显著性VCL任务相同的表现。然而,在低显著性中等信息反馈任务中,VCL受到了显著损害。我们认为,这种低显著性中等信息学习场景的特点是存在一个“认知循环悖论”,即两个相互依赖的学习过程必须同时发生。