Brocklehurst Paul H, Drake Eleanor, Corley Martin
School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland, UK.
School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland, UK.
J Fluency Disord. 2015 Jun;44:46-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
Using a multi-dimensional measure of perfectionism: the Frost Multi-dimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS: Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990), this study investigates: (a) whether adults who stutter (AWS) display more perfectionistic attitudes and beliefs than those who do not stutter, and (b) whether, in AWS, more perfectionistic attitudes and beliefs are associated with greater self-reported difficulty communicating verbally and speaking fluently.
In the first analysis, FMPS responses from 81 AWS and 81 matched, normally-fluent controls were analyzed using logistic regression to investigate the relative contributions of four FMPS perfectionism-subscale self-ratings to the likelihood of being in the AWS group. In the subsequent analyses, data from the 81 AWS were analyzed using linear multiple regression to determine which FMPS subscale self-ratings best predicted their Communication-Difficulty and Fluency-Difficulty scores.
Both the likelihood of being a member of the AWS group, and also the magnitude of the AWS group's Communication-Difficulty and Fluency-Difficulty scores, were positively part-correlated to respondents' Concern over Mistakes-Doubts about Actions (CMD) subscale self-ratings but negatively part-correlated to their Personal Standards (PS) subscale self-ratings.
The FMPS profiles of respondents who stutter suggest that, as a group, they are not abnormally perfectionistic overall, but may be (or perceive themselves to be) abnormally error-prone. Also, AWS who are more concerned about their errors and uncertain of their actions experience more difficulty communicating verbally and speaking fluently.
After reading this article, participants will be able to: (a) describe the findings of previous research investigating the role of perfectionism in stuttering and psychopathologies; (b) discuss why a multidimensional assessment of perfectionism is important in relation to stuttering; (c) discuss ways in which data from perfectionism assessments can contribute to the planning of therapy for adults who stutter.
本研究使用一种多维完美主义测量方法:弗罗斯特多维完美主义量表(FMPS:弗罗斯特、马滕、拉哈特和罗森布拉特,1990年),调查:(a)口吃成年人(AWS)是否比非口吃成年人表现出更多的完美主义态度和信念,以及(b)在AWS中,更多的完美主义态度和信念是否与自我报告的言语交流困难和流利说话困难程度更高相关。
在首次分析中,使用逻辑回归分析了81名AWS和81名匹配的、言语正常流利的对照组的FMPS回答,以研究FMPS完美主义四个子量表的自我评分对属于AWS组可能性的相对贡献。在随后的分析中,使用线性多元回归分析了81名AWS的数据,以确定哪些FMPS子量表的自我评分最能预测他们的沟通困难和流利度困难得分。
成为AWS组成员的可能性,以及AWS组的沟通困难和流利度困难得分的大小,与受访者对错误的关注——对行动的怀疑(CMD)子量表自我评分呈正偏相关,但与他们的个人标准(PS)子量表自我评分呈负偏相关。
口吃受访者的FMPS概况表明,作为一个群体,他们总体上并非异常完美主义,但可能(或认为自己)异常容易出错。此外,更担心自己错误且对自己行为不确定的AWS在言语交流和流利说话方面会遇到更多困难。
阅读本文后,参与者将能够:(a)描述先前研究调查完美主义在口吃和精神病理学中作用的结果;(b)讨论为什么完美主义的多维评估对口吃很重要;(c)讨论完美主义评估数据可如何有助于为口吃成年人制定治疗计划。