Lucey Jaclyn, Evans David, Maxfield Nathan D
Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Departments of Oncologic Sciences and Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Aug 15;62(8):2691-2702. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0225. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Purpose The study aim was to determine whether self-reported temperament traits differentiate adults who stutter (AWS) from adults who do not stutter (AWNS). Additionally, associations between temperament and stuttering frequency, and between temperament and quality of life impacts of stuttering, were investigated in AWS. Method Self-reported temperament traits were documented for 33 AWS and 43 AWNS using the Adult Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ; Evans & Rothbart, 2007). Quality-of-life impacts of stuttering were assessed using the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience with Stuttering (Yaruss & Quesal, 2010). Stuttering frequency was calculated from 100-word monologue and reading samples. Results A between-groups difference in scores on the ATQ Positive Affect subscale was nominally significant (i.e., before correcting for multiple tests) and also approached statistical significance after Bonferroni correction. Positive Affect scores were lower for AWS, and the size of this trending effect was moderate. Within AWS, a statistically significant positive correlation was found between impact scores on the General Information section of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience with Stuttering and ATQ Frustration subscale scores after Bonferroni correction. No associations were detected between temperament traits and stuttering frequency. Conclusions Results reveal a nontrivial tendency for AWS to experience decreased positive affect compared to AWNS. In addition, increased frustration was found to be associated with reduced general knowledge about stuttering in AWS. Neither effect has been previously reported for adults or children who stutter. Finally, self-reported temperament traits were not found to vary with stuttering frequency in adults, consistent with previous results for AWS.
目的 本研究旨在确定自我报告的气质特征是否能区分口吃成年人(AWS)与非口吃成年人(AWNS)。此外,还在AWS中研究了气质与口吃频率之间的关联,以及气质与口吃对生活质量影响之间的关联。方法 使用成人气质问卷(ATQ;Evans & Rothbart,2007)记录了33名AWS和43名AWNS的自我报告气质特征。使用口吃者总体体验评估量表(Yaruss & Quesal,2010)评估口吃对生活质量的影响。根据100字独白和阅读样本计算口吃频率。结果 ATQ积极情感分量表得分的组间差异在名义上具有显著性(即,在进行多重检验校正之前),经Bonferroni校正后也接近统计学显著性。AWS的积极情感得分较低且这种趋势效应的大小适中。在AWS中经Bonferroni校正后,发现口吃者总体体验评估量表一般信息部分的影响得分与ATQ挫折分量表得分之间存在统计学显著的正相关。未检测到气质特征与口吃频率之间的关联。结论 结果显示,与AWNS相比,AWS经历积极情感减少的倾向并非微不足道。此外,发现挫折感增加与AWS中对口吃的一般了解减少有关。此前在口吃的成年人或儿童中均未报告过这两种效应情况。最后,未发现自我报告的气质特征随成年人口吃频率而变化,这与AWS之前的研究结果一致。