• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对两种屏幕观看行为、社交互动行为的动机以及影响观看意愿的因素进行探讨。

An exploration of motivations for two screen viewing, social interaction behaviors, and factors that influence viewing intentions.

机构信息

1 Broadcasting Media Research Division, Korea Information Society Development Institute , Jincheon-gun, Korea.

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Mar;18(3):158-64. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0543.

DOI:10.1089/cyber.2014.0543
PMID:25751047
Abstract

This study explores whether, and how, motivations for two screen viewing predicted social interaction behaviors and subsequent viewing intention of TV programs. A total of 453 respondents who responded that they use social networking sites (SNSs) via smartphones and actively watch entertainment programs completed an online survey questionnaire. In agreement with uses and gratifications assumptions, motivations for TSV predicted distinctive sets of social interaction behaviors, which mediated the influence of motivations on viewing intentions. Respondents' two screen viewing was meaningfully related with social interaction, engagement with programs, information seeking, and passing time. Results suggest that two screen viewing could provide shared experiences nourishing social capital and reintegrate TV audiences by social adhesive resulting from TV with SNSs.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨电视屏幕使用动机是否以及如何预测社交互动行为,以及随后对电视节目的观看意愿。共有 453 名通过智能手机使用社交网络服务(SNS)并积极观看娱乐节目的受访者完成了在线问卷调查。与使用与满足假设一致,TSV 的动机预测了独特的社交互动行为,这些行为中介了动机对观看意愿的影响。受访者的双屏观看与社交互动、对节目的参与、信息搜索和打发时间有显著的关系。研究结果表明,双屏观看可以通过社交网络服务(SNS)与电视之间的社交粘性,提供滋养社会资本的共同体验,从而重新整合电视观众。

相似文献

1
An exploration of motivations for two screen viewing, social interaction behaviors, and factors that influence viewing intentions.对两种屏幕观看行为、社交互动行为的动机以及影响观看意愿的因素进行探讨。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Mar;18(3):158-64. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0543.
2
Influence of a multidimensional measure of attitudes on motives to use social networking sites.多维态度测量对使用社交网站动机的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Mar;18(3):165-72. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0423.
3
Prolonged Screen Viewing Times and Sociodemographic Factors among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China.孕妇长时间屏幕观看时间与社会人口学因素:中国的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 27;15(3):403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030403.
4
Social network games uncovered: motivations and their attitudinal and behavioral outcomes.社交网络游戏揭秘:动机及其态度和行为结果。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Dec;15(12):643-8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0093. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
5
Exploring the motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan.探究台湾地区使用 Facebook 的动机。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Jun;15(6):304-11. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0611.
6
Pictures Speak Louder than Words: Motivations for Using Instagram.图片胜于言语:使用照片墙(Instagram)的动机
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Sep;18(9):552-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0157.
7
Networking for philanthropy: increasing volunteer behavior via social networking sites.慈善事业的人际网络:通过社交网站增加志愿者行为
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Mar;17(3):160-5. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0415. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
8
Individual differences in in-person and social media television coviewing: the role of emotional contagion, need to belong, and coviewing orientation.线下与社交媒体电视共看行为中的个体差异:情绪感染、归属感需求及共看倾向的作用
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Aug;17(8):512-8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0484. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
9
Desire to Belong Affects Instagram Behavior and Perceived Social Support.归属感影响 Instagram 行为和感知到的社会支持。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Jul;22(7):465-471. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0533.
10
Mourning and Grief on Facebook: An Examination of Motivations for Interacting With the Deceased.Facebook上的哀悼与悲痛:对与逝者互动动机的考察
Omega (Westport). 2017 Dec;76(2):122-140. doi: 10.1177/0030222816688284. Epub 2017 Jan 11.