Tenney Elizabeth R, Logg Jennifer M, Moore Don A
David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah.
Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;108(3):377-399. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000018.
A series of experiments investigated why people value optimism and whether they are right to do so. In Experiments 1A and 1B, participants prescribed more optimism for someone implementing decisions than for someone deliberating, indicating that people prescribe optimism selectively, when it can affect performance. Furthermore, participants believed optimism improved outcomes when a person's actions had considerable, rather than little, influence over the outcome (Experiment 2). Experiments 3 and 4 tested the accuracy of this belief; optimism improved persistence, but it did not improve performance as much as participants expected. Experiments 5A and 5B found that participants overestimated the relationship between optimism and performance even when their focus was not on optimism exclusively. In summary, people prescribe optimism when they believe it has the opportunity to improve the chance of success-unfortunately, people may be overly optimistic about just how much optimism can do.
一系列实验探究了人们重视乐观主义的原因以及他们这样做是否正确。在实验1A和1B中,与正在考虑的人相比,参与者会给正在执行决策的人更多的乐观主义建议,这表明当乐观主义能够影响表现时,人们会有选择地给出乐观主义建议。此外,参与者认为当一个人的行动对结果有很大影响而非影响很小时,乐观主义能改善结果(实验2)。实验3和4检验了这种信念的准确性;乐观主义能提高坚持性,但它对表现的改善程度并没有参与者预期的那么大。实验5A和5B发现,即使参与者的关注点并不完全在乐观主义上,他们仍然高估了乐观主义与表现之间的关系。总之,当人们认为乐观主义有机会提高成功几率时,他们就会给出乐观主义建议——不幸的是,人们可能对乐观主义的作用过于乐观了。