• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无粘弹剂的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术:一项前瞻性个体内比较研究

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery without OVD: a prospective intraindividual comparison.

作者信息

Schargus Marc, Suckert Nathanael, Schultz Tim, Kakkassery Vinodh, Dick H Burkhard

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;31(3):146-52. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150220-01.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20150220-01
PMID:25751829
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery without the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) with standard phacoemulsification using OVD.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of 37 patients (74 eyes) diagnosed as having significant cataract in both eyes. Randomly, one eye underwent standard phacoemulsification with OVD (the OVD group); this group acted as controls. The other eye was treated with the femtosecond laser; the subsequent manual part of the procedure was performed without OVD (non-OVD group). Time of surgery, amount of fluid used during phacoemulsification, central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, endothelial cell count, and visual acuity were documented over the 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

There were no major complications and no significant difference in overall surgery time (non-OVD: 375 ± 81 seconds; OVD: 362 ± 43 seconds; P = .713) and in the quantity of fluid passing through the eye (non-OVD: 187 ± 35 mL; OVD: 186 ± 27 mL; P = .952) between groups. Endothelial cell loss after 6 months was not significantly different between groups (non-OVD: -2.4%; OVD: -2.7%; P = .880). Central corneal thickness was not different at 1 week postoperatively between groups (non-OVD: 575 ± 45 µm; OVD: 573 ± 46 µm; P = .820). Three patients in the OVD group and one patient in the non-OVD group experienced intraocular pressure greater than 25 mm Hg at 1 day postoperatively. There were no significant differences in corrected distance visual acuity between groups (logMAR non-OVD: 0.024; OVD: 0.038; P = .461).

CONCLUSIONS

Femtosecond laser-assisted treatment allows the cataract surgeon to perform phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation without the use of OVD at no additional risk to the corneal endothelium. Furthermore, there was a tendency toward fewer increases in intraocular pressure in patients treated with the femtosecond laser.

摘要

目的

比较不使用眼科粘弹剂(OVD)的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与使用OVD的标准超声乳化白内障吸除术。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、单中心试验,纳入37例(74只眼)双眼诊断为有明显白内障的患者。随机选取一只眼进行使用OVD的标准超声乳化白内障吸除术(OVD组);该组作为对照组。另一只眼接受飞秒激光治疗;手术的后续手动部分在不使用OVD的情况下进行(非OVD组)。在6个月的随访期间记录手术时间、超声乳化过程中使用的液体量、中央角膜厚度、眼压、内皮细胞计数和视力。

结果

两组均未出现重大并发症,总体手术时间(非OVD组:375±81秒;OVD组:362±43秒;P = 0.713)和通过眼内的液体量(非OVD组:187±35 mL;OVD组:186±27 mL;P = 0.952)无显著差异。6个月后两组内皮细胞损失无显著差异(非OVD组:-2.4%;OVD组:-2.7%;P = 0.880)。术后1周两组中央角膜厚度无差异(非OVD组:575±45 µm;OVD组:573±46 µm;P = 0.820)。OVD组有3例患者和非OVD组有1例患者术后1天眼压大于25 mmHg。两组矫正远视力无显著差异(logMAR非OVD组:0.024;OVD组:0.038;P = 0.461)。

结论

飞秒激光辅助治疗使白内障手术医生能够在不使用OVD的情况下进行超声乳化白内障吸除术和人工晶状体植入术,且不会给角膜内皮带来额外风险。此外,接受飞秒激光治疗的患者眼压升高的趋势较小。

相似文献

1
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery without OVD: a prospective intraindividual comparison.无粘弹剂的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术:一项前瞻性个体内比较研究
J Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;31(3):146-52. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150220-01.
2
Comparison of the performance and safety of 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in cataract surgery.两种眼科粘弹剂在白内障手术中的性能与安全性比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.025.
3
Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术对角膜内皮的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1777-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.031. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
4
Cohesive versus dispersive-cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device in torsional intelligent phaco.用于扭转式智能超声乳化术中的粘性与分散-粘性眼科粘弹剂
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):681-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.010.
5
Prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating efficacy and safety of a new ophthalmic viscosurgical device in patients undergoing cataract surgery.前瞻性随机临床试验评估一种新型眼科黏弹剂在白内障手术患者中的疗效和安全性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Sep 1;50(9):906-911. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001473.
6
Corneal endothelial cell loss and corneal thickness in conventional compared with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: three-month follow-up.与飞秒激光辅助白内障手术相比,传统白内障手术对角膜内皮细胞丢失和角膜厚度的影响:三个月随访。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
7
Central corneal volume and endothelial cell count following femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery compared to conventional phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助的屈光性白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术后中央角膜体积和内皮细胞计数的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;28(6):387-91. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120508-02. Epub 2012 May 16.
8
Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery.与传统白内障手术相比,飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中的内皮细胞丢失和屈光可预测性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;92(7):617-22. doi: 10.1111/aos.12406. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
Comparison of corneal endothelial cell loss during phacoemulsification using continuous anterior chamber infusion versus those using ophthalmic viscosurgical device: randomized controlled trial.使用连续前房灌注与使用眼科粘弹剂进行白内障超声乳化手术时角膜内皮细胞丢失情况的比较:随机对照试验
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar-Apr;57(2):99-103. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.45500.
10
Comparative outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and manual phacoemusification: a six-month follow-up.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与手法超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较结果:六个月随访
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;44(6):472-80. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12695. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Timing for Intraocular Pressure Measurement Following Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后眼压测量的最佳时机:系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 25;19:1045-1055. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S509212. eCollection 2025.
2
Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery.激光辅助白内障手术与标准超声乳化白内障手术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 23;6(6):CD010735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010735.pub3.
3
Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification on corneal impact: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术对角膜影响的比较:Meta 分析和系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284181. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of complication rates between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术并发症发生率的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 18;16(1):156-158. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.25. eCollection 2023.
5
Clinical outcomes and complications between FLACS and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a PRISMA-compliant Meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)与传统超声乳化白内障手术的临床结局及并发症:一项符合PRISMA标准的25项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 18;14(7):1081-1091. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.07.18. eCollection 2021.
6
Corneal Endothelial Health after Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery without Viscoelastic Substance.无黏弹剂的白内障超声乳化手术后的角膜内皮健康状况
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 26;33(1):75-81. doi: 10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_185_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
7
Comparable effects on tear film parameters after femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统白内障手术对泪膜参数的影响相当。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;40(11):3097-3104. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01532-z. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
8
Surgical efficiency in femtosecond laser cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a case-control study.飞秒激光白内障手术与超声乳化白内障手术的手术效率比较:一项病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 17;8(2):e018478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018478.
9
A Review of Laser-Assisted Versus Traditional Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery.激光辅助与传统超声乳化白内障手术的综述
Ophthalmol Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):7-18. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0080-z. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery.激光辅助白内障手术与标准超声乳化白内障手术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 8;7(7):CD010735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010735.pub2.