Suppr超能文献

通过利用结构先验对锥数据(CCD)施加一致性来增强k空间定量磁化率映射。

Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors.

作者信息

Wen Yan, Wang Yi, Liu Tian

机构信息

MedImageMetric LLC, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2016 Feb;75(2):823-30. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25652. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The inversion from the magnetic field to the magnetic susceptibility distribution is ill-posed because the dipole kernel, which relates the magnetic susceptibility to the magnetic field, has zeroes at a pair of cone surfaces in the k-space, leading to streaking artifacts on the reconstructed quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM). A method to impose consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors is proposed to improve the solutions of k-space methods.

METHODS

The information in the cone region is recovered by enforcing structural consistency with structural prior, while information in the noncone trust region is enforced to be consistent with the magnetic field measurements in k-space. This CCD method was evaluated by comparing the initial results of existing QSM algorithms to the QSM results after CCD enhancement with respect to the COSMOS results in simulation, phantom, and in vivo human brain.

RESULTS

The proposed method demonstrated suppression of streaking artifacts and the resulting QSM showed better agreement with reference standard QSM compared with other k-space based methods.

CONCLUSION

By enforcing consistency with structural priors in the cone region, the missing data in the cone can be recovered and the streaking artifacts in QSM can be suppressed.

摘要

目的

从磁场到磁化率分布的反演是不适定的,因为将磁化率与磁场相关联的偶极核在k空间中的一对锥面上存在零点,这会导致在重建的定量磁化率图(QSM)上出现条纹伪影。提出了一种利用结构先验对锥数据(CCD)施加一致性的方法,以改进k空间方法的解。

方法

通过与结构先验强制结构一致性来恢复锥区域中的信息,同时强制非锥信任区域中的信息与k空间中的磁场测量结果一致。通过将现有QSM算法的初始结果与在模拟、体模和体内人脑方面相对于COSMOS结果进行CCD增强后的QSM结果进行比较,对这种CCD方法进行了评估。

结果

所提出的方法显示出对条纹伪影的抑制作用,并且与其他基于k空间的方法相比,所得的QSM与参考标准QSM显示出更好的一致性。

结论

通过在锥区域中与结构先验强制一致性,可以恢复锥中的缺失数据并抑制QSM中的条纹伪影。

相似文献

2
Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Nov;64(11):2531-2545. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2749298.
3
Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.
NMR Biomed. 2015 Oct;28(10):1294-303. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3383. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
4
Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach.
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Mar;83(3):858-871. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27976. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain.
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):2083-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.067. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
6
Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
J Magn Reson. 2017 Aug;281:130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Iterative projection onto convex sets for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Feb;73(2):697-703. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25155. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jul;78(1):303-315. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26331. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:111-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.043. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
10
Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection.
Med Phys. 2020 Nov;47(11):5715-5722. doi: 10.1002/mp.14460. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

3
Ex-vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain hemispheres.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 20;12(12):e0188395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188395. eCollection 2017.
4
Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.
NMR Biomed. 2015 Oct;28(10):1294-303. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3383. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
5
Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;25 Suppl 2:225-30. doi: 10.1007/s00062-015-0432-9. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1-regularization and automatic parameter selection.
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Nov;72(5):1444-59. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25029. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
2
Noise Effects in Various Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Methods.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Dec;60(12):3441-8. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2266795. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
3
Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: superfast dipole inversion.
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Jun;69(6):1582-94. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24405. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
4
Improving susceptibility mapping using a threshold-based K-space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach.
Magn Reson Med. 2013 May;69(5):1396-407. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24384. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
5
Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain.
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):2083-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.067. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
6
Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Feb;69(2):467-76. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24272. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
8
Accuracy of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm for quantitative susceptibility mapping in MRI.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Mar;31(3):816-24. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2182523. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
10
Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing.
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jan;67(1):137-47. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23000. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验