Jones Sandra C, Magee Christopher, Andrews Kelly
Centre for Health and Social Research (CHaSR), Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Health Initiatives, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015 Sep;34(5):531-539. doi: 10.1111/dar.12258. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
A growing body of research indicates parental supply of alcohol to children and adolescents is common. The present study aimed to examine parents' reasons for supplying alcohol to adolescents that they may find hard to articulate or not be consciously aware of.
A projective methodology was used, whereby respondents were asked to explain the thoughts and motivations of a gender-matched parent in a scenario in which the parent did or did not provide alcohol to their teenage child. Respondents were 97 mothers and 83 fathers of teenagers who completed an anonymous online survey. Open-ended responses were coded thematically; t-tests were used to compare quantitative responses between the scenarios.
The quantitative analysis found the parent who provided alcohol was less likely to be seen as making sure their child was safe and educating them about boundaries, but more likely to be seen as being a friend as well as a parent and (for females only) making sure their child fits in with others. The open-ended responses showed explanations for not providing alcohol most commonly focused on ensuring the child's safety, obeying the law, and setting rules and boundaries, and for providing alcohol focused on ensuring the child fit in with peers and beliefs about harm minimisation.
The findings suggest that these respondents (parents) harboured a number of misperceptions about underage drinking and experienced conflicts in weighing up the perceived benefits of providing alcohol to their children against the risks of adolescent drinking. [Jones SC, Magee C, Andrews K. 'I think other parents might. …': Using a projective technique to explore parental supply of alcohol. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015;34:531-9].
越来越多的研究表明,父母向儿童和青少年提供酒精饮料的现象很常见。本研究旨在探究父母向青少年提供酒精饮料的原因,这些原因他们可能难以清晰表达或并未有意识地意识到。
采用投射法,即要求受访者解释在父母向其十几岁的孩子提供或不提供酒精饮料的情景中,与自己性别匹配的父母的想法和动机。受访者为97名青少年的母亲和83名青少年的父亲,他们完成了一项匿名在线调查。对开放式回答进行主题编码;使用t检验比较不同情景下的定量回答。
定量分析发现,提供酒精饮料的父母不太可能被视为确保孩子安全并对其进行界限教育,但更有可能被视为既是朋友又是父母(仅针对女性),并确保孩子与他人融洽相处。开放式回答表明,不提供酒精饮料的原因最常集中在确保孩子安全、遵守法律以及设定规则和界限上,而提供酒精饮料的原因则集中在确保孩子与同龄人融洽相处以及关于危害最小化的信念上。
研究结果表明,这些受访者(父母)对未成年人饮酒存在一些误解,并且在权衡向孩子提供酒精饮料的潜在益处与青少年饮酒风险时经历了冲突。[琼斯·S·C、马吉·C、安德鲁斯·K。“我认为其他父母可能会……”:使用投射技术探究父母提供酒精饮料的情况。《药物与酒精评论》2015年;34:531 - 9]